Aftershock Spatiotemporal Activity and Coseismic Slip Model of the 2022 Mw 6.7 Luding Earthquake: Fault Geometry Structures and Complex Rupture Characteristics

On 5 September 2022, the moment magnitude (Mw) 6.7 Luding earthquake struck in the Xianshuihe Fault system on the eastern edge of the Tibet Plateau, illuminating the seismic gap in the Moxi segment. The fault system geometry and rupture process of this earthquake are relatively complex. To better understand the underlying driving mechanisms, this study first uses the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) technique to obtain static surface displacements, which are then combined with Global Positioning System (GPS) data to invert the coseismic slip distribution. A machine learning approach is applied to extract a high-quality aftershock catalog from the original seismic waveform data, enabling the analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of aftershock activity. The catalog is subsequently used for fault fitting to determine a reliable fault geometry. The coseismic slip is dominated by left-lateral strike-slip motion, distributed within a depth range of 0–15 km, with a maximum fault slip > 2 m. The relocated catalog contains 15,571 events. Aftershock activity is divided into four main seismic clusters, with two smaller clusters located to the north and south and four interval zones in between. The geometry of the five faults is fitted, revealing the complexity of the Xianshuihe Fault system. Additionally, the Luding earthquake did not fully rupture the Moxi segment. The unruptured areas to the north of the mainshock, as well as regions to the south near the Anninghe Fault, pose a potential seismic hazard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010070
Citations
2
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aftershock Spatiotemporal Activity and Coseismic Slip Model of the 2022 Mw 6.7 Luding Earthquake: Fault Geometry Structures and Complex Rupture Characteristics

Hongwei Liang, Hongyi Li, Xinjian Shan, Q. Hu et al.
2 citations
Remote Sensing
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.07
article

Aftershock Spatiotemporal Activity and Coseismic Slip Model of the 2022 Mw 6.7 Luding Earthquake: Fault Geometry Structures and Complex Rupture Characteristics

Hongwei Liang, Hongyi Li, Xinjian Shan, Q. Hu, Guohong Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

On 5 September 2022, the moment magnitude (Mw) 6.7 Luding earthquake struck in the Xianshuihe Fault system on the eastern edge of the Tibet Plateau, illuminating the seismic gap in the Moxi segment. The fault system geometry and rupture process of this earthquake are relatively complex. To better understand the underlying driving mechanisms, this study first uses the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) technique to obtain static surface displacements, which are then combined with Global Positioning System (GPS) data to invert the coseismic slip distribution. A machine learning approach is applied to extract a high-quality aftershock catalog from the original seismic waveform data, enabling the analysis of the spatiotemporal characteristics of aftershock activity. The catalog is subsequently used for fault fitting to determine a reliable fault geometry. The coseismic slip is dominated by left-lateral strike-slip motion, distributed within a depth range of 0–15 km, with a maximum fault slip > 2 m. The relocated catalog contains 15,571 events. Aftershock activity is divided into four main seismic clusters, with two smaller clusters located to the north and south and four interval zones in between. The geometry of the five faults is fitted, revealing the complexity of the Xianshuihe Fault system. Additionally, the Luding earthquake did not fully rupture the Moxi segment. The unruptured areas to the north of the mainshock, as well as regions to the south near the Anninghe Fault, pose a potential seismic hazard.

Remote SensingVol. 17(1)
China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Institute of Disaster Prevention (CN), Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, China Earthquake Administration (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.