PERBANDINGAN K-MEDOIDS DAN CLARA (Clustering Large Application) PADA DATA POPULASI TERNAK DI INDONESIA

This study compares the K-Medoids and CLARA (Clustering Large Application) methods for livestock population data in Indonesian districts and cities. Calculating the distance between points and objects in the data, K-Medoids is a method for clustering based on data points (medoids). A larger dataset is divided into several samples for comparison in CLARA, an extension of the K-Medoids approach. The CLARA method analysis results show that three clusters are the ideal number. The ideal number of clusters in a K-Medoids cluster analysis is two. The Silhouette Score (SS), Davis-Bouldin Index (DBI), and Calinski-Harabasz Index (CHI) are the metrics that are measured. The evaluation of the comparison results shows that the CLARA method has an SS value of 0.66, while K-Medoids has an SS value of 0.62. The comparison of the CLARA and K-Medoids approaches yielded DBI values of 1.38 and 1.92, respectively, and 197.54 and 132.73 for CHI. The findings indicate that, in comparison to the K-Medoids approach, the SS value for the CLARA method is closer to 1, and that the CHI value derived from the CLARA method is likewise greater. The K-Medoids approach has a higher DBI value than the CLARA method, where a lower DBI value denotes superior performance. The CLARA approach is the most effective way to do cluster analysis on livestock population data in Indonesian districts and cities, according to the findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Lebesgue Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Matematika dan Statistika
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v5i3.764
Primary Topic
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PERBANDINGAN K-MEDOIDS DAN CLARA (Clustering Large Application) PADA DATA POPULASI TERNAK DI INDONESIA

Erfiani Erfiani, Anwar Fitrianto, L.M. Risman Dwi Jumansyah, Rizky Ardhani et al.
Jurnal Lebesgue Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Matematika dan Statistika
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
article

PERBANDINGAN K-MEDOIDS DAN CLARA (Clustering Large Application) PADA DATA POPULASI TERNAK DI INDONESIA

Erfiani Erfiani, Anwar Fitrianto, L.M. Risman Dwi Jumansyah, Rizky Ardhani, Sean Marshelle
article en

Abstract

This study compares the K-Medoids and CLARA (Clustering Large Application) methods for livestock population data in Indonesian districts and cities. Calculating the distance between points and objects in the data, K-Medoids is a method for clustering based on data points (medoids). A larger dataset is divided into several samples for comparison in CLARA, an extension of the K-Medoids approach. The CLARA method analysis results show that three clusters are the ideal number. The ideal number of clusters in a K-Medoids cluster analysis is two. The Silhouette Score (SS), Davis-Bouldin Index (DBI), and Calinski-Harabasz Index (CHI) are the metrics that are measured. The evaluation of the comparison results shows that the CLARA method has an SS value of 0.66, while K-Medoids has an SS value of 0.62. The comparison of the CLARA and K-Medoids approaches yielded DBI values of 1.38 and 1.92, respectively, and 197.54 and 132.73 for CHI. The findings indicate that, in comparison to the K-Medoids approach, the SS value for the CLARA method is closer to 1, and that the CHI value derived from the CLARA method is likewise greater. The K-Medoids approach has a higher DBI value than the CLARA method, where a lower DBI value denotes superior performance. The CLARA approach is the most effective way to do cluster analysis on livestock population data in Indonesian districts and cities, according to the findings.

Jurnal Lebesgue Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Matematika dan StatistikaVol. 5(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.