The Influence of the Clinical Context on nursing organizational well-being: A Cross-sectional study

Introduction. A healthcare organization that promotes the well-being of its nurses ensures better quality and safety for patients. Studies have focused on investigating nurses' experiences without examining the differences related to specific clinical contexts in determining their organizational well-being. This study aims to identify which variables in specific nursing clinical contexts are associated with their reported organizational well-being. Methods. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. A convenience sample of nurses from different departments (e.g., medicine, surgery, emergency room) was recruited in different hospital settings across Italy. Data were collected through a web survey comprising validated instruments that investigated organizational well-being and associated variables (e.g., work-home conflicts, relationships, resources). Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted. Results. The study included 272 nurses. In medical departments, organizational well-being was associated with nurses' relationships with physicians (r = 0.35, p < 0.001), colleagues (r = 0.32, p < 0.01), and head nurse (r = 0.23, p < 0.05), available resources (r = 0.46, p < 0.001), workload (r = -0.23, p < 0.05), and work-home conflicts (r = -0.49, p < 0.001). In surgical departments, it was associated with available resources (r = 0.36, p < 0.01), relationships with the head nurse (r = 0.47, p < 0.001), and work-home conflicts (r = -0.29, p < 0.01). In emergency departments, it was associated with nurses' relationships with physicians (r = 0.24, p < 0.05) and head nurses (r = 0.29, p < 0.01), available resources (r = 0.42, p < 0.001), workload (r = -0.25, p < 0.01), and work-home conflicts (r = -0.38, p < 0.001). The mean scores for workload and relationships with the head nurse differed among the considered departments. Discussion. The results underlined differences in organizational well-being perception depending on the clinical context. Relationships with physicians and colleagues were only associated with nurses' well-being in specific clinical settings. In contrast, work-family conflicts, availability of resources, and relationships with the head nurse were common clinical context variables influencing the organizational well-being perceived by nurses. This study adds to the existing literature by highlighting how different clinical environments shape nurses' organizational well-being, emphasizing the need for tailored organizational interventions to address context-specific challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
infermieristica journal
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36253/if-2908
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of the Clinical Context on nursing organizational well-being: A Cross-sectional study

Alessandro Sili, Francesco Zaghini, Jacopo Fiorini, Valerio Della Bella
2 citations
infermieristica journal
Health and Well-being Studies
1.28
article

The Influence of the Clinical Context on nursing organizational well-being: A Cross-sectional study

Alessandro Sili, Francesco Zaghini, Jacopo Fiorini, Valerio Della Bella
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction. A healthcare organization that promotes the well-being of its nurses ensures better quality and safety for patients. Studies have focused on investigating nurses' experiences without examining the differences related to specific clinical contexts in determining their organizational well-being. This study aims to identify which variables in specific nursing clinical contexts are associated with their reported organizational well-being. Methods. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. A convenience sample of nurses from different departments (e.g., medicine, surgery, emergency room) was recruited in different hospital settings across Italy. Data were collected through a web survey comprising validated instruments that investigated organizational well-being and associated variables (e.g., work-home conflicts, relationships, resources). Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted. Results. The study included 272 nurses. In medical departments, organizational well-being was associated with nurses' relationships with physicians (r = 0.35, p < 0.001), colleagues (r = 0.32, p < 0.01), and head nurse (r = 0.23, p < 0.05), available resources (r = 0.46, p < 0.001), workload (r = -0.23, p < 0.05), and work-home conflicts (r = -0.49, p < 0.001). In surgical departments, it was associated with available resources (r = 0.36, p < 0.01), relationships with the head nurse (r = 0.47, p < 0.001), and work-home conflicts (r = -0.29, p < 0.01). In emergency departments, it was associated with nurses' relationships with physicians (r = 0.24, p < 0.05) and head nurses (r = 0.29, p < 0.01), available resources (r = 0.42, p < 0.001), workload (r = -0.25, p < 0.01), and work-home conflicts (r = -0.38, p < 0.001). The mean scores for workload and relationships with the head nurse differed among the considered departments. Discussion. The results underlined differences in organizational well-being perception depending on the clinical context. Relationships with physicians and colleagues were only associated with nurses' well-being in specific clinical settings. In contrast, work-family conflicts, availability of resources, and relationships with the head nurse were common clinical context variables influencing the organizational well-being perceived by nurses. This study adds to the existing literature by highlighting how different clinical environments shape nurses' organizational well-being, emphasizing the need for tailored organizational interventions to address context-specific challenges.

infermieristica journalVol. 3(4)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Health and Well-being Studies
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.