Comparison of Intracoronary Verapamil and Adenosine for No-Reflow in Normotensive Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intracoronary verapamil versus adenosine in managing the no-reflow phenomenon in normotensive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methodology: We conducted a prospective observational study at Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar from March 2023 to March 2024. A total of 150 normotensive ACS patients scheduled for PCI were enrolled and treated with either intracoronary verapamil (200 µg) or adenosine (48 µg) based on the clinical judgment of the treating cardiologist upon identifying the no-reflow phenomenon. The primary outcomes included improvements in myocardial perfusion, assessed by the achievement of TIMI III flow immediately and at 30 minutes via angiographic analysis. Secondary outcomes assessed were microvascular resistance (IMR), endothelial function (FMD), and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within six months. Results: The verapamil group exhibited a higher percentage of patients achieving TIMI III flow post-treatment compared to the adenosine group (92% vs. 78%, p = 0.03). Both treatment groups demonstrated reductions in IMR (verapamil: 18.5 ± 2.8 units; adenosine: 19.1 ± 3.1 units, p = 0.29) and improvements in FMD (verapamil: 4.1 ± 0.5%; adenosine: 3.9 ± 0.6%, p = 0.15). The incidence of MACE was 18% in the verapamil group and 8% in the adenosine group, indicating comparable safety profiles for both agents. Conclusion: Intracoronary verapamil and adenosine both effectively enhance myocardial perfusion and endothelial function in normotensive ACS patients following PCI. Verapamil showed a slight advantage in achieving TIMI III flow and reducing microvascular resistance, suggesting it may offer superior benefits in specific clinical scenarios. These results support the use of both agents in managing the no-reflow phenomenon, with potential preference for verapamil in particular contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Heart Journal
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v57i4.2787
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Intracoronary Verapamil and Adenosine for No-Reflow in Normotensive Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study

Sami Ullah Shakir, Syed Hashim Ali Shah, Qazi Najeeb Ullah Amin, Sweta Shah et al.
1 citations
Pakistan Heart Journal
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.40
article

Comparison of Intracoronary Verapamil and Adenosine for No-Reflow in Normotensive Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study

Sami Ullah Shakir, Syed Hashim Ali Shah, Qazi Najeeb Ullah Amin, Sweta Shah, Arshad Ali, Nasir Ali, Muhammad Abdur Rauf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intracoronary verapamil versus adenosine in managing the no-reflow phenomenon in normotensive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methodology: We conducted a prospective observational study at Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar from March 2023 to March 2024. A total of 150 normotensive ACS patients scheduled for PCI were enrolled and treated with either intracoronary verapamil (200 µg) or adenosine (48 µg) based on the clinical judgment of the treating cardiologist upon identifying the no-reflow phenomenon. The primary outcomes included improvements in myocardial perfusion, assessed by the achievement of TIMI III flow immediately and at 30 minutes via angiographic analysis. Secondary outcomes assessed were microvascular resistance (IMR), endothelial function (FMD), and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within six months. Results: The verapamil group exhibited a higher percentage of patients achieving TIMI III flow post-treatment compared to the adenosine group (92% vs. 78%, p = 0.03). Both treatment groups demonstrated reductions in IMR (verapamil: 18.5 ± 2.8 units; adenosine: 19.1 ± 3.1 units, p = 0.29) and improvements in FMD (verapamil: 4.1 ± 0.5%; adenosine: 3.9 ± 0.6%, p = 0.15). The incidence of MACE was 18% in the verapamil group and 8% in the adenosine group, indicating comparable safety profiles for both agents. Conclusion: Intracoronary verapamil and adenosine both effectively enhance myocardial perfusion and endothelial function in normotensive ACS patients following PCI. Verapamil showed a slight advantage in achieving TIMI III flow and reducing microvascular resistance, suggesting it may offer superior benefits in specific clinical scenarios. These results support the use of both agents in managing the no-reflow phenomenon, with potential preference for verapamil in particular contexts.

Pakistan Heart JournalVol. 57(4)
Khyber Teaching Hospital (PK), Hayatabad Medical Complex (PK), National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.