Protocols of spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and indications

Several studies have shown that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a very effective way to treat chronic pain when other treatments, such as medications and surgery, have not been effective. This study examines the mechanics, clinical results, and particular indications of the three main SCS protocols: burst, high-frequency, and tonic stimulation. Based on the gate control principle, tonic stimulation has been applied extensively but has several drawbacks, such as decreasing effectiveness with time. A superior treatment option for back and leg pain is high-frequency stimulation, which lessens discomfort without producing paresthesia. By modifying brain activity, especially in the anterior cingulate cortex, burst stimulation targets the affective components of pain and improves patients’ quality of life. Even with SCS’s advances, problems like tolerance and decreased long-term efficacy still exist. Closed-loop and data-driven intelligent SCS systems are among the future directions that will usher in a new era in chronic pain management by providing real-time modifications and individualized treatment programs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/n9hysm62
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protocols of spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and indications

Jiajun Liu
Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Protocols of spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and indications

Jiajun Liu
article en

Abstract

Several studies have shown that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a very effective way to treat chronic pain when other treatments, such as medications and surgery, have not been effective. This study examines the mechanics, clinical results, and particular indications of the three main SCS protocols: burst, high-frequency, and tonic stimulation. Based on the gate control principle, tonic stimulation has been applied extensively but has several drawbacks, such as decreasing effectiveness with time. A superior treatment option for back and leg pain is high-frequency stimulation, which lessens discomfort without producing paresthesia. By modifying brain activity, especially in the anterior cingulate cortex, burst stimulation targets the affective components of pain and improves patients’ quality of life. Even with SCS’s advances, problems like tolerance and decreased long-term efficacy still exist. Closed-loop and data-driven intelligent SCS systems are among the future directions that will usher in a new era in chronic pain management by providing real-time modifications and individualized treatment programs.

Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental ProtectionVol. 1(10)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Protocols of spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and indications — Jiajun Liu · Science and Technology of Engineering Chemistry and Environmental Protection (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS