Effects of microarthropod density on soil fungal community composition in nutrient‐poor ecosystems

Abstract Microarthropods such as mites (Acari) and springtails (Collembola) play a key role in the functioning of nutrient‐poor ecosystems. They contribute to the comminution of organic matter and they are likely to affect the structure and function of soil microbial communities through grazing and by changing substrate availability. However, the precise effects of their interactions with microbiota remain poorly understood. In the present study, we conducted a mesocosm field experiment to determine the effects of soil microarthropod density on community composition of soil fungi. We manipulated microarthropod densities in 100 defaunated and soil‐filled meshed mesocosms by inoculating half of the units with microarthropods (i.e. high‐density treatment), while the other half of the units only contained few specimens possibly hatching from recalcitrant eggs that survived defaunation (i.e. low‐density treatment). All mesocosms were then inserted in the top soil of a range of nutrient‐poor grasslands and heathlands in Belgium for the duration of three months. The entire mesocosms were composed of mesh (30 μm mesh size) to allow for a rapid (re‐)colonization by microbes from the surrounding soils, while migration of microarthropods in or out of the mesocosms was precluded. Litter bags (30 μm mesh size) containing two types of organic matter were also buried within each mesocosm, and organic matter mass loss over time was used as a proxy to assess effects of microarthropod density on microbe‐regulated decomposition rates. We found that fungal community composition differed strongly between the two microarthropod density treatments, regardless of habitat type. The mesocosms with higher microarthropod densities were characterized by a higher number of fungal OTUs and a higher number of fungal indicator species associated to this treatment. Microarthropod density, however, did not affect microbe‐regulated organic matter decomposition rates, nor did it affect relative abundances of putative fungal functional groups, thus suggesting considerable levels of fungal functional overlap. Synthesis . The lack of measurable changes in organic matter decomposition or shifts in fungal functional group representation suggest that effects of microarthropods on the functioning of fungal communities may be lower than originally thought. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14733
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of microarthropod density on soil fungal community composition in nutrient‐poor ecosystems

Rudy van Diggelen, Andrés A. Salazar‐Fillippo, Ladislav Miko, Erik Verbruggen et al.
2 citations
Functional Ecology
Nematode management and characterization studies
1.20
article

Effects of microarthropod density on soil fungal community composition in nutrient‐poor ecosystems

Rudy van Diggelen, Andrés A. Salazar‐Fillippo, Ladislav Miko, Erik Verbruggen, Willem‐Jan Emsens, Jan Frouz, Seppe Strybos, Charlotte Liczner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Microarthropods such as mites (Acari) and springtails (Collembola) play a key role in the functioning of nutrient‐poor ecosystems. They contribute to the comminution of organic matter and they are likely to affect the structure and function of soil microbial communities through grazing and by changing substrate availability. However, the precise effects of their interactions with microbiota remain poorly understood. In the present study, we conducted a mesocosm field experiment to determine the effects of soil microarthropod density on community composition of soil fungi. We manipulated microarthropod densities in 100 defaunated and soil‐filled meshed mesocosms by inoculating half of the units with microarthropods (i.e. high‐density treatment), while the other half of the units only contained few specimens possibly hatching from recalcitrant eggs that survived defaunation (i.e. low‐density treatment). All mesocosms were then inserted in the top soil of a range of nutrient‐poor grasslands and heathlands in Belgium for the duration of three months. The entire mesocosms were composed of mesh (30 μm mesh size) to allow for a rapid (re‐)colonization by microbes from the surrounding soils, while migration of microarthropods in or out of the mesocosms was precluded. Litter bags (30 μm mesh size) containing two types of organic matter were also buried within each mesocosm, and organic matter mass loss over time was used as a proxy to assess effects of microarthropod density on microbe‐regulated decomposition rates. We found that fungal community composition differed strongly between the two microarthropod density treatments, regardless of habitat type. The mesocosms with higher microarthropod densities were characterized by a higher number of fungal OTUs and a higher number of fungal indicator species associated to this treatment. Microarthropod density, however, did not affect microbe‐regulated organic matter decomposition rates, nor did it affect relative abundances of putative fungal functional groups, thus suggesting considerable levels of fungal functional overlap. Synthesis . The lack of measurable changes in organic matter decomposition or shifts in fungal functional group representation suggest that effects of microarthropods on the functioning of fungal communities may be lower than originally thought. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional EcologyVol. 39(2)
University of Antwerp (BE), Charles University (CZ), Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp (BE), Institute of Soil Biology (CZ)
Přírodovědecká Fakulta, Univerzita Karlova, Universiteit Antwerpen
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Nematode management and characterization studies
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.