Comparative Analysis of Colistin Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: VITEK® 2 Compact Versus Broth Microdilution Method

Background Colistin, a last-resort antibiotic, has witnessed a surge in resistance, posing a significant threat to public health. Accurate and timely detection of colistin resistance is crucial for effective clinical management. This study aims to compare two commonly used methods, the VITEK® 2 Compact (bioMerieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) system and broth microdilution (BMD), for identifying colistin resistance in clinical isolates. Materials and methods The study was carried out in the Microbiology Department at Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad. The laboratory processed the specimens for identification, followed by antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the automated VITEK® 2 Compact system and the gold-standard BMD method. Results A total of 92 <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> isolates were examined using automation (VITEK® 2 Compact) and the BMD methods, and the findings were analyzed. A gender-based analysis of the study population showed that 67% were males and 33% were females. Among the various specimens received, the highest number of colistin-resistant isolates was found in urine (38 isolates, 41.30%), then pus (25 isolates, 25.17%), endotracheal tube (13 isolates, 14.13%), sterile fluid (7 isolates, 7.60%), blood (3 isolates, 3.26%), sputum (3 isolates, 3.26%), vaginal swab (2 isolates, 2.17%), and catheter (1 isolate, 1.08%). Of the 92 <i>P. aeruginosa</i> isolates, 59 (64.1%) were resistant to colistin by the BMD, while 41 (44.56%) were resistant by the VITEK® 2 Compact. Conclusion Colistin is increasingly used for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. In this study, some isolates showed differing results between VITEK® 2 Compact and BMD. The statistical analysis showed moderate kappa agreement, confirming the consistent reliability of the VITEK® 2 Compact system for testing colistin minimum inhibitory concentrations. Consequently, we can employ the VITEK® 2 Compact automated system as an alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76646
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Colistin Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: VITEK® 2 Compact Versus Broth Microdilution Method

Satyajeet Pawar, Satish R. Patil, Suvarna A. Yadav, Kajal Yadav
1 citations
Cureus
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
0.17
article

Comparative Analysis of Colistin Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: VITEK® 2 Compact Versus Broth Microdilution Method

Satyajeet Pawar, Satish R. Patil, Suvarna A. Yadav, Kajal Yadav
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Colistin, a last-resort antibiotic, has witnessed a surge in resistance, posing a significant threat to public health. Accurate and timely detection of colistin resistance is crucial for effective clinical management. This study aims to compare two commonly used methods, the VITEK® 2 Compact (bioMerieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) system and broth microdilution (BMD), for identifying colistin resistance in clinical isolates. Materials and methods The study was carried out in the Microbiology Department at Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad. The laboratory processed the specimens for identification, followed by antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the automated VITEK® 2 Compact system and the gold-standard BMD method. Results A total of 92 <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> isolates were examined using automation (VITEK® 2 Compact) and the BMD methods, and the findings were analyzed. A gender-based analysis of the study population showed that 67% were males and 33% were females. Among the various specimens received, the highest number of colistin-resistant isolates was found in urine (38 isolates, 41.30%), then pus (25 isolates, 25.17%), endotracheal tube (13 isolates, 14.13%), sterile fluid (7 isolates, 7.60%), blood (3 isolates, 3.26%), sputum (3 isolates, 3.26%), vaginal swab (2 isolates, 2.17%), and catheter (1 isolate, 1.08%). Of the 92 <i>P. aeruginosa</i> isolates, 59 (64.1%) were resistant to colistin by the BMD, while 41 (44.56%) were resistant by the VITEK® 2 Compact. Conclusion Colistin is increasingly used for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. In this study, some isolates showed differing results between VITEK® 2 Compact and BMD. The statistical analysis showed moderate kappa agreement, confirming the consistent reliability of the VITEK® 2 Compact system for testing colistin minimum inhibitory concentrations. Consequently, we can employ the VITEK® 2 Compact automated system as an alternative.

CureusVol. 16(12)
University of Kara (TG), Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed University (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
0.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.