Impact of High- and Low-Pass Acoustic Filtering on Audiovisual Speech Redundancy and Benefit in Children

For isolated word recognition, visual speech is more complementary with the acoustic speech cues children can access when high-frequency acoustic content is eliminated by low-pass filtering than when low-frequency acoustic content is eliminated by high-pass filtering. This decreased auditory-visual phonetic redundancy is accompanied by larger audiovisual benefit. In contrast, audiovisual benefit for sentence recognition did not differ between low-pass and high-pass filtered speech. This might reflect ceiling effects in audiovisual conditions or a decrease in the contribution of auditory-visual phonetic redundancy to explaining audiovisual benefit for connected speech. These results from children with typical hearing suggest that some variance in audiovisual benefit among children who are hard of hearing may depend in part on frequency-specific audibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear and Hearing
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001622
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of High- and Low-Pass Acoustic Filtering on Audiovisual Speech Redundancy and Benefit in Children

Kaylah Lalonde, Abby Pitts, Adam K. Bosen, Grace A. Dwyer
Ear and Hearing
Multisensory perception and integration
article

Impact of High- and Low-Pass Acoustic Filtering on Audiovisual Speech Redundancy and Benefit in Children

Kaylah Lalonde, Abby Pitts, Adam K. Bosen, Grace A. Dwyer
article en

Abstract

For isolated word recognition, visual speech is more complementary with the acoustic speech cues children can access when high-frequency acoustic content is eliminated by low-pass filtering than when low-frequency acoustic content is eliminated by high-pass filtering. This decreased auditory-visual phonetic redundancy is accompanied by larger audiovisual benefit. In contrast, audiovisual benefit for sentence recognition did not differ between low-pass and high-pass filtered speech. This might reflect ceiling effects in audiovisual conditions or a decrease in the contribution of auditory-visual phonetic redundancy to explaining audiovisual benefit for connected speech. These results from children with typical hearing suggest that some variance in audiovisual benefit among children who are hard of hearing may depend in part on frequency-specific audibility.

Ear and HearingVol. 46(3)
Apple (Israel) (IL), Boys Town National Research Hospital (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Multisensory perception and integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.