Revealing the Preference Falsification in Russia

Abstract In this study, the authors investigate the phenomenon of the influence of preference falsification in sociological surveys on socially controversial topics in the context of illiberal states. Based on the classical theories of individuals hiding their true views under the influence of public discourse and state policy, the authors test the hypothesis that in Russia the phenomenon of preference falsification affects the responses of citizens, forcing them to postulate more conservative values than those what they really profess. To confirm this hypothesis, the authors replicate the in-person World Values Survey with an online survey conducted via crowdsourcing and compare the results. The clarification of the obtained data is carried out using the Implicit Associative Test. The authors find correlated and predictable differences between results obtained online and those found in the WVS survey, which suggests that preference falsification strongly affects results of field sociological surveys and this effect is absent in surveys conducted online.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Sociology
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-bja10123
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revealing the Preference Falsification in Russia

Boris Tseitlin, Andrew Zhdanov
1 citations
Comparative Sociology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
1.13
article

Revealing the Preference Falsification in Russia

Boris Tseitlin, Andrew Zhdanov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, the authors investigate the phenomenon of the influence of preference falsification in sociological surveys on socially controversial topics in the context of illiberal states. Based on the classical theories of individuals hiding their true views under the influence of public discourse and state policy, the authors test the hypothesis that in Russia the phenomenon of preference falsification affects the responses of citizens, forcing them to postulate more conservative values than those what they really profess. To confirm this hypothesis, the authors replicate the in-person World Values Survey with an online survey conducted via crowdsourcing and compare the results. The clarification of the obtained data is carried out using the Implicit Associative Test. The authors find correlated and predictable differences between results obtained online and those found in the WVS survey, which suggests that preference falsification strongly affects results of field sociological surveys and this effect is absent in surveys conducted online.

Comparative SociologyVol. 23(6)
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (RU), National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revealing the Preference Falsification in Russia — Boris Tseitlin, Andrew Zhdanov · Comparative Sociology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS