Axiological Insights into Unveiling Independent Constitutional Judge Decisionism

<p><em><span lang="IN">This study analyzes</span><span lang="IN">how axiological principles such as justice, utility, and justice influence judicial decisions and impact the credibility and effectiveness of the legal system. Critically analyzing case studies and theoretical perspectives examines the interplay between judicial independence and accountability. The article emphasizes the role of values in shaping laws, advocating for consistency and consideration of consequences in judicial decision-making. It argues that moral and ethical principles are central to judicial discretion, ensuring that decisions align with societal values and legal integrity. This nuanced analysis contributes to the discourse on how value-driven decision-making enhances the coherence and legitimacy of the legal system, offering insights into the balance between judicial autonomy and responsibility</span></em></p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v13i3.85127
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Axiological Insights into Unveiling Independent Constitutional Judge Decisionism

Sindung Tjahyadi, Rizal Mustansyir, Artha Debora Silalahi, Septiana Dwiputri Maharani
2 citations
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
8.15
article

Axiological Insights into Unveiling Independent Constitutional Judge Decisionism

Sindung Tjahyadi, Rizal Mustansyir, Artha Debora Silalahi, Septiana Dwiputri Maharani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<p><em><span lang="IN">This study analyzes</span><span lang="IN">how axiological principles such as justice, utility, and justice influence judicial decisions and impact the credibility and effectiveness of the legal system. Critically analyzing case studies and theoretical perspectives examines the interplay between judicial independence and accountability. The article emphasizes the role of values in shaping laws, advocating for consistency and consideration of consequences in judicial decision-making. It argues that moral and ethical principles are central to judicial discretion, ensuring that decisions align with societal values and legal integrity. This nuanced analysis contributes to the discourse on how value-driven decision-making enhances the coherence and legitimacy of the legal system, offering insights into the balance between judicial autonomy and responsibility</span></em></p>

Yustisia Jurnal HukumVol. 13(3)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
8.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Axiological Insights into Unveiling Independent Constitutional Judge Decisionism — Sindung Tjahyadi, Rizal Mustansyir, et al. · Yustisia Jurnal Hukum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS