Two types of D-licensing approach to Nominative/Genitive Conversion in Japanese: with some comparative notes on Hitiku and Osaka dialects and Inner Mongolian

This study discusses two analyses within the D-licensing approach to Nominative/Genitive Conversion (NGC), a phenomenon observed in Altaic languages such as Japanese, Turkish, and Mongolian. Japanese generative grammarians have endeavored to elucidate the case-alternation system, identifying two approaches: D-licensing and C-licensing approaches. The former assumes that the genitive case on the subject DP is licensed by the D-head of the hostmain noun, while the latter assumes that it is licensed by the C-head of the prenominal clause. the a -as Both approaches exhibit advantages and disadvantages; we focus on however, this study focuses on the former approach, study omitting discussion of the latter. A crucial aspect of the D-licensing approach revolves around the size of the prenominal clause, TP. Nevertheless, the traditional D-licensing approach analytical framework encounters challenges when dealing with NGC involved in nominative object constructions. Recently, a new analysis under the D-licensing approach has been proposed, in which the licensor is D, but the size of the prenominal clause is CP. We contend that this novel analysis raises some concerns as a result of the adopted assumptions. Therefore, we propose substituting by them with Chomsky’s labeling algorithm and Saito’s anti-labeling devices method. Additionally, we discuss dialectical variations in NGC, exploring Hitiku and Osaka Japanese, as well as the same drawing parallels with Mongolian.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Mongolica
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22353/am.202401.02
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two types of D-licensing approach to Nominative/Genitive Conversion in Japanese: with some comparative notes on Hitiku and Osaka dialects and Inner Mongolian

Naouki Akaso
Acta Mongolica
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Two types of D-licensing approach to Nominative/Genitive Conversion in Japanese: with some comparative notes on Hitiku and Osaka dialects and Inner Mongolian

Naouki Akaso
article en

Abstract

This study discusses two analyses within the D-licensing approach to Nominative/Genitive Conversion (NGC), a phenomenon observed in Altaic languages such as Japanese, Turkish, and Mongolian. Japanese generative grammarians have endeavored to elucidate the case-alternation system, identifying two approaches: D-licensing and C-licensing approaches. The former assumes that the genitive case on the subject DP is licensed by the D-head of the hostmain noun, while the latter assumes that it is licensed by the C-head of the prenominal clause. the a -as Both approaches exhibit advantages and disadvantages; we focus on however, this study focuses on the former approach, study omitting discussion of the latter. A crucial aspect of the D-licensing approach revolves around the size of the prenominal clause, TP. Nevertheless, the traditional D-licensing approach analytical framework encounters challenges when dealing with NGC involved in nominative object constructions. Recently, a new analysis under the D-licensing approach has been proposed, in which the licensor is D, but the size of the prenominal clause is CP. We contend that this novel analysis raises some concerns as a result of the adopted assumptions. Therefore, we propose substituting by them with Chomsky’s labeling algorithm and Saito’s anti-labeling devices method. Additionally, we discuss dialectical variations in NGC, exploring Hitiku and Osaka Japanese, as well as the same drawing parallels with Mongolian.

Acta MongolicaVol. 22(606)
Nagoya Gakuin University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.