Signal estimation bias in x-ray dark-field imaging using dual phase grating interferometer

Abstract In x-ray dark-field imaging using dual phase grating interferometer, multi-contrast signals are extracted from a set of acquired phase-stepping data by using the least-squares fitting algorithm. The extracted mean intensity, amplitude and visibility signals may be intrinsically biased. However, it is still unclear how large these biases are and how the data acquisition parameters influence the biases in the extracted signals. This work set out to address these questions. Analytical expressions of the biases of the extracted signals were theoretically derived by using a second-order Taylor series expansion. Extensive numerical simulations were performed to validate the theoretical results. It is illustrated that while the estimated mean intensity signal is always unbiased, the estimated amplitude and visibility signals are both positively biased. While the biases of the estimated amplitude signals are proportional to the inverse of the total number of phase steps, the biases of the estimated visibility signals are inversely proportional to the product of the total number of phase steps and the mean number of photons counted per phase step. Meanwhile, it is demonstrated that the dependence of the biases on the mean visibility is quite different from that of Talbot–Lau interferometer due to the difference in the intensity model. We expect that these results can be useful for data acquisition optimizations and interpretation of x-ray dark-field images.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Physics B
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ada430
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Signal estimation bias in x-ray dark-field imaging using dual phase grating interferometer

Zun Zhang, Heng Chen, Xin Quan Ge, Zhili Wang
Chinese Physics B
Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
article

Signal estimation bias in x-ray dark-field imaging using dual phase grating interferometer

Zun Zhang, Heng Chen, Xin Quan Ge, Zhili Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract In x-ray dark-field imaging using dual phase grating interferometer, multi-contrast signals are extracted from a set of acquired phase-stepping data by using the least-squares fitting algorithm. The extracted mean intensity, amplitude and visibility signals may be intrinsically biased. However, it is still unclear how large these biases are and how the data acquisition parameters influence the biases in the extracted signals. This work set out to address these questions. Analytical expressions of the biases of the extracted signals were theoretically derived by using a second-order Taylor series expansion. Extensive numerical simulations were performed to validate the theoretical results. It is illustrated that while the estimated mean intensity signal is always unbiased, the estimated amplitude and visibility signals are both positively biased. While the biases of the estimated amplitude signals are proportional to the inverse of the total number of phase steps, the biases of the estimated visibility signals are inversely proportional to the product of the total number of phase steps and the mean number of photons counted per phase step. Meanwhile, it is demonstrated that the dependence of the biases on the mean visibility is quite different from that of Talbot–Lau interferometer due to the difference in the intensity model. We expect that these results can be useful for data acquisition optimizations and interpretation of x-ray dark-field images.

Chinese Physics BVol. 34(3)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Hefei University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.