Geometrical comparison of inline and staggered stack wire mesh absorbers for solar volumetric receivers

Open volumetric receivers using air as the heat transfer fluid can operate at higher temperatures and thermal efficiencies than the current state of the art in central receiver systems. Optimising their design requires detailed understanding of two critical operational attributes: the heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and the pressure drop. This work examines these attributes in two dense wire mesh absorber arrangements, inline (IL) and staggered (ST), with single-mesh porosities of 80 % and wire diameters of 0.7, 0.4 and 0.1 mm. A 2D porous model or homogeneous equivalent model (HEM) with local thermal non-equilibrium (LTNE) is developed, using a flux density of 600 kW/m 2 and an air inlet velocity of 1 m/s. The model is experimentally validated and subsequently used to evaluate the generalised correlations (GCs) obtained for the thermo-fluid-dynamic attributes with those derived from the individual correlations (ICs). In addition, the model assesses the impact of the different wire diameters and arrangements on thermal and fluid flow performance. The findings reveal that the ST arrangement generally outperforms the IL arrangement in thermal efficiency, except for the 0.1 mm wire diameter. Conversely, the IL arrangement demonstrates superior hydrodynamic performance. Finally, the results are corroborated with existing literature, which further validates the reliability of the numerical model and its conclusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.105729
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometrical comparison of inline and staggered stack wire mesh absorbers for solar volumetric receivers

Antonio L. Ávila-Marín, Miguel A. Reyes-Belmonte, Daniel Sánchez-Señorán, Marina Casanova et al.
2 citations
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
0.20
article

Geometrical comparison of inline and staggered stack wire mesh absorbers for solar volumetric receivers

Antonio L. Ávila-Marín, Miguel A. Reyes-Belmonte, Daniel Sánchez-Señorán, Marina Casanova, Michael Kinzel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Open volumetric receivers using air as the heat transfer fluid can operate at higher temperatures and thermal efficiencies than the current state of the art in central receiver systems. Optimising their design requires detailed understanding of two critical operational attributes: the heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and the pressure drop. This work examines these attributes in two dense wire mesh absorber arrangements, inline (IL) and staggered (ST), with single-mesh porosities of 80 % and wire diameters of 0.7, 0.4 and 0.1 mm. A 2D porous model or homogeneous equivalent model (HEM) with local thermal non-equilibrium (LTNE) is developed, using a flux density of 600 kW/m 2 and an air inlet velocity of 1 m/s. The model is experimentally validated and subsequently used to evaluate the generalised correlations (GCs) obtained for the thermo-fluid-dynamic attributes with those derived from the individual correlations (ICs). In addition, the model assesses the impact of the different wire diameters and arrangements on thermal and fluid flow performance. The findings reveal that the ST arrangement generally outperforms the IL arrangement in thermal efficiency, except for the 0.1 mm wire diameter. Conversely, the IL arrangement demonstrates superior hydrodynamic performance. Finally, the results are corroborated with existing literature, which further validates the reliability of the numerical model and its conclusions.

Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringVol. 66
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), University of Almería (ES), Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
European Regional Development Fund
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.