Proportions or Perspectives? Didactic Medievalism – Moving the Body to the Fore in Czech History Textbooks

This paper analyses history textbooks currently used in the Czech Republic; it focuseson how they deal with the issue of the historicity of the body and its related functions, and relations in pre‑modern history. It shows that the medieval body is surprisingly present in primary and secondary education, at least through history textbooks. The ways in which it is presented, however, are problematic: it remains at the margins of the canonical narrative and is not used to develop key competencies associated with historical thinking (unlike some topics in political history). In explanatory texts the history of the body is incorporated mostly in apparently unreflective ways. The author argues that a rearrangement of information and changes of perspective (which would make the historicity of the body the focus of the interpretation) would be enough to offer a more complex view of the historicity of the human body in pre‑modern societies. He also expresses hope for more research‑oriented (thus not just transmissive) teaching materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Historica Gedanensia
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/23916001hg.24.034.20462
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proportions or Perspectives? Didactic Medievalism – Moving the Body to the Fore in Czech History Textbooks

Martin Šorm
Studia Historica Gedanensia
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
article

Proportions or Perspectives? Didactic Medievalism – Moving the Body to the Fore in Czech History Textbooks

Martin Šorm
article en

Abstract

This paper analyses history textbooks currently used in the Czech Republic; it focuseson how they deal with the issue of the historicity of the body and its related functions, and relations in pre‑modern history. It shows that the medieval body is surprisingly present in primary and secondary education, at least through history textbooks. The ways in which it is presented, however, are problematic: it remains at the margins of the canonical narrative and is not used to develop key competencies associated with historical thinking (unlike some topics in political history). In explanatory texts the history of the body is incorporated mostly in apparently unreflective ways. The author argues that a rearrangement of information and changes of perspective (which would make the historicity of the body the focus of the interpretation) would be enough to offer a more complex view of the historicity of the human body in pre‑modern societies. He also expresses hope for more research‑oriented (thus not just transmissive) teaching materials.

Studia Historica GedanensiaVol. 15(2)
Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.