Deep Learning Unravels Differences Between Kinematic and Kinetic Gait Cycle Time Series from Two Control Samples of Healthy Children Assessed in Two Different Gait Laboratories

We investigate the application of deep learning in comparing gait cycle time series from two groups of healthy children, each assessed in different gait laboratories. Both laboratories used similar gait analysis protocols with minimal differences in data collection. Utilizing a ResNet-based deep learning model, we successfully identified the source laboratory of each dataset, achieving a high classification accuracy across multiple gait parameters. To address the inter-laboratory differences, we explored various pre-processing methods and time series properties that may have been detected by the algorithm. We found that the standardization of the time series values was a successful approach to decrease the ability of the model to distinguish between the two centers. Our findings also reveal that differences in the power spectra and autocorrelation structures of the datasets play a significant role in the model performance. Our study emphasizes the importance of standardized protocols and robust data pre-processing to enhance the transferability of machine learning models across clinical settings, particularly for deep learning approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010110
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning Unravels Differences Between Kinematic and Kinetic Gait Cycle Time Series from Two Control Samples of Healthy Children Assessed in Two Different Gait Laboratories

Alfonso de Gorostegui, Estrella Rausell, J. López-López, Irene Pulido‐Valdeolivas et al.
1 citations
Sensors
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
0.35
article

Deep Learning Unravels Differences Between Kinematic and Kinetic Gait Cycle Time Series from Two Control Samples of Healthy Children Assessed in Two Different Gait Laboratories

Alfonso de Gorostegui, Estrella Rausell, J. López-López, Irene Pulido‐Valdeolivas, Damien Kiernan, Massimiliano Zanin, David Gómez‐Andrés, Juan-Andrés Martín-Gonzalo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigate the application of deep learning in comparing gait cycle time series from two groups of healthy children, each assessed in different gait laboratories. Both laboratories used similar gait analysis protocols with minimal differences in data collection. Utilizing a ResNet-based deep learning model, we successfully identified the source laboratory of each dataset, achieving a high classification accuracy across multiple gait parameters. To address the inter-laboratory differences, we explored various pre-processing methods and time series properties that may have been detected by the algorithm. We found that the standardization of the time series values was a successful approach to decrease the ability of the model to distinguish between the two centers. Our findings also reveal that differences in the power spectra and autocorrelation structures of the datasets play a significant role in the model performance. Our study emphasizes the importance of standardized protocols and robust data pre-processing to enhance the transferability of machine learning models across clinical settings, particularly for deep learning approaches.

SensorsVol. 25(1)
Instituto Cajal (ES), Central Remedial Clinic (IE), Institute for Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Complex Systems (ES), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Escuela Universitaria de Fisioterapia de la ONCE (ES), Hospital Universitario del Henares (ES), Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Pfizer, Biogen, FibroGen, Sarepta Therapeutics, Audentes Therapeutics, Italfarmaco, UCB Pharma
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.