Comparative Analysis of Tillage Indices and Machine Learning Algorithms for Maize Residue Cover Prediction

Remote sensing estimation of maize residue cover (MRC) can rapidly acquire large-scale data on MRC, crucial for monitoring and promoting conservation tillage. Herein, seven tillage indices derived from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery were analyzed alongside measured MRC data to assess their correlation with MRC. MRC estimation models were built using six machine learning algorithms, including back propagation neural network (BPNN), random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Stacking1, and Stacking2. Model performance was compared using the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The potential for conservation tillage was explored. The results showed that the R2 values of the seven tillage indices in the study area exceeded 0.5, with particularly high correlations for NDTI and STI, with R2 values of 0.755 and 0.751, respectively. When using machine learning algorithms to construct models, the Stacking2 model exhibited the highest estimation accuracy, with an R2 of 0.923, RMSE of 3.32%, and MAE of 0.025, while Stacking1 also demonstrated robust performance, with an R2 of 0.910, RMSE of 3.45%, and MAE of 0.029. Among the base models, XGBoost achieved the highest estimation performance and the lowest error, with R2, RMSE, and MAE values of 0.884, 4.77%, and 0.031, respectively. The R2 values of RF, SVR, and BPNN were 0.865, 0.859, and 0.842, respectively, with RMSE values of 4.06%, 4.76%, and 5.91%, and MAE values of 0.039, 0.047, and 0.059, respectively. These results indicate that the Stacking2 model demonstrates a significant advantage in prediction accuracy. Geostatistical analysis of the inversion results of the Stacking2 model revealed that the proportions of farmland with MRC values exceeding 30% in Changchun, Songyuan, and Siping were 81.90%, 77.96%, and 83.58%, respectively. This indicates that Changchun and Siping have greater potential for implementing conservation tillage. This study demonstrates that the stacking ensemble learning model significantly improves the predictive performance by leveraging the strengths of multiple base models and accurately monitoring the spatial distribution of MRC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010105
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Tillage Indices and Machine Learning Algorithms for Maize Residue Cover Prediction

C. Zhang, Zhengwei Liang, Kaiming Zhuo, Jia Du et al.
2 citations
Remote Sensing
Smart Agriculture and AI
1.20
article

Comparative Analysis of Tillage Indices and Machine Learning Algorithms for Maize Residue Cover Prediction

C. Zhang, Zhengwei Liang, Kaiming Zhuo, Jia Du, Weilin Yu, Yu Han, Jian Li, Jie Qin, Song Kaishan, Weijian Zhang, Yiwei Zhang, Kaixuan Shao, Bingrun Sui
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Remote sensing estimation of maize residue cover (MRC) can rapidly acquire large-scale data on MRC, crucial for monitoring and promoting conservation tillage. Herein, seven tillage indices derived from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery were analyzed alongside measured MRC data to assess their correlation with MRC. MRC estimation models were built using six machine learning algorithms, including back propagation neural network (BPNN), random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Stacking1, and Stacking2. Model performance was compared using the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The potential for conservation tillage was explored. The results showed that the R2 values of the seven tillage indices in the study area exceeded 0.5, with particularly high correlations for NDTI and STI, with R2 values of 0.755 and 0.751, respectively. When using machine learning algorithms to construct models, the Stacking2 model exhibited the highest estimation accuracy, with an R2 of 0.923, RMSE of 3.32%, and MAE of 0.025, while Stacking1 also demonstrated robust performance, with an R2 of 0.910, RMSE of 3.45%, and MAE of 0.029. Among the base models, XGBoost achieved the highest estimation performance and the lowest error, with R2, RMSE, and MAE values of 0.884, 4.77%, and 0.031, respectively. The R2 values of RF, SVR, and BPNN were 0.865, 0.859, and 0.842, respectively, with RMSE values of 4.06%, 4.76%, and 5.91%, and MAE values of 0.039, 0.047, and 0.059, respectively. These results indicate that the Stacking2 model demonstrates a significant advantage in prediction accuracy. Geostatistical analysis of the inversion results of the Stacking2 model revealed that the proportions of farmland with MRC values exceeding 30% in Changchun, Songyuan, and Siping were 81.90%, 77.96%, and 83.58%, respectively. This indicates that Changchun and Siping have greater potential for implementing conservation tillage. This study demonstrates that the stacking ensemble learning model significantly improves the predictive performance by leveraging the strengths of multiple base models and accurately monitoring the spatial distribution of MRC.

Remote SensingVol. 17(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology (CN), Jilin Agricultural University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Smart Agriculture and AI
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.