Assessing Perceptions of Genetically Improved Tree Species Among Family Forest Owners (FFO) in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin

Forests face ongoing challenges that can threaten species' survival, forest health, and potentially create human impacts. Genetic engineering allows scientists to potentially address these concerns by creating genetically improved trees (GITs). Little research exists regarding the acceptance of GITs among potential implementers, such as family forest owners (FFO). This study explores stated GIT acceptance among FFOs in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin through survey data and alongside existing research. We problematize “social acceptance” when detached from the realities of adoption, implementation, and decision-making. This paper contributes insights into FFO perceptions of GITs and regarding the research design of similar studies. Respondents associated greater benefit and less risk with genetic improvement methods that may be perceived as “more natural,” and stated that they would be willing to consider planting GITs under certain conditions. Policymakers and scientists should consider the perspectives of potential technology implementers related to GIT use given their role in greater forest management.