Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Funding Policies in China and the UK from the Perspective of Education Finance

China and the United Kingdom have numerous similarities when it comes to higher education funding policies, and both have gone through a process from “single” to “diverse”. The purpose of this paper is to make a comparative study of the higher education funding policies in China and the UK from the perspective of education finance, and to expose the similarities and differences through an in-depth analysis of the higher education funding objects, funding methods, funding subjects, and repayment methods in the two countries, and to find that there are problems in China’s higher education funding, such as the limited scope of funding, the lack of coordinated student financial aid institutions, the imprecision of funding, and the imperfect repayment system. Learn from the successful experience of the United Kingdom and propose to integrate into the construction of a subsidized education environment for China’s higher education funding; Improve targeted funding and people-oriented; Establish a complete repayment system and extend the repayment period to ensure that more students graduate smoothly and promote educational equity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Arts Culture and Language
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/06vhhq97
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Funding Policies in China and the UK from the Perspective of Education Finance

Ying He
Arts Culture and Language
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Funding Policies in China and the UK from the Perspective of Education Finance

Ying He
article en

Abstract

China and the United Kingdom have numerous similarities when it comes to higher education funding policies, and both have gone through a process from “single” to “diverse”. The purpose of this paper is to make a comparative study of the higher education funding policies in China and the UK from the perspective of education finance, and to expose the similarities and differences through an in-depth analysis of the higher education funding objects, funding methods, funding subjects, and repayment methods in the two countries, and to find that there are problems in China’s higher education funding, such as the limited scope of funding, the lack of coordinated student financial aid institutions, the imprecision of funding, and the imperfect repayment system. Learn from the successful experience of the United Kingdom and propose to integrate into the construction of a subsidized education environment for China’s higher education funding; Improve targeted funding and people-oriented; Establish a complete repayment system and extend the repayment period to ensure that more students graduate smoothly and promote educational equity.

Arts Culture and LanguageVol. 1(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Funding Policies in China and the UK from the Perspective of Education Finance — Ying He · Arts Culture and Language (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS