The Role of Incentive Respiratory Techniques in Enhanced Recovery After Lung Cancer Resection: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

<b>Background:</b> Postoperative physiotherapy is a cornerstone of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs, especially following lung resection. Despite its importance, the literature lacks clear recommendations and guidelines, particularly regarding the role of Incentive Respiratory Techniques (IT). This study aims to determine whether IT offers additional benefits over early ambulation in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective case–control study at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) involving patients who underwent lung resection from February 2019 to June 2022. Patients were divided into two cohorts: early ambulation (control group) and early ambulation with IT (IT group). The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay and time to chest drain removal. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed based on age, sex, and BMI. Data were compared using Chi-squared and Student’s t-tests as appropriate. <b>Results:</b>A total of 304 patients were included, with 153 in the intervention group and 151 in the control group. After propensity-score matching, 52 patients from each cohort were compared. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding postoperative oxygen requirement, fever, atelectasis, residual pleural space, need for bronchoscopy toilette, and re-hospitalization rate. IT group showed trends toward shorter hospital stays and lower time to chest drain removal, though without reaching statistical significance.<b>Conclusions:</b> IT did not significantly improve postoperative outcomes compared to early ambulation in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer. More extensive, prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010100
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Incentive Respiratory Techniques in Enhanced Recovery After Lung Cancer Resection: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Lorenzo Spaggiari, Federica Baggi, Francesco Petrella, Patrick Maisonneuve et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.26
article

The Role of Incentive Respiratory Techniques in Enhanced Recovery After Lung Cancer Resection: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Lorenzo Spaggiari, Federica Baggi, Francesco Petrella, Patrick Maisonneuve, Luca Bertolaccini, G Caffarena, Lara Girelli, Monica Casiraghi, Antonio Mazzella, Cristina Diotti, Riccardo Orlandi, Silvia Zanardi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Postoperative physiotherapy is a cornerstone of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs, especially following lung resection. Despite its importance, the literature lacks clear recommendations and guidelines, particularly regarding the role of Incentive Respiratory Techniques (IT). This study aims to determine whether IT offers additional benefits over early ambulation in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective case–control study at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) involving patients who underwent lung resection from February 2019 to June 2022. Patients were divided into two cohorts: early ambulation (control group) and early ambulation with IT (IT group). The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay and time to chest drain removal. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed based on age, sex, and BMI. Data were compared using Chi-squared and Student’s t-tests as appropriate. <b>Results:</b>A total of 304 patients were included, with 153 in the intervention group and 151 in the control group. After propensity-score matching, 52 patients from each cohort were compared. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding postoperative oxygen requirement, fever, atelectasis, residual pleural space, need for bronchoscopy toilette, and re-hospitalization rate. IT group showed trends toward shorter hospital stays and lower time to chest drain removal, though without reaching statistical significance.<b>Conclusions:</b> IT did not significantly improve postoperative outcomes compared to early ambulation in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer. More extensive, prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(1)
University of Milan (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.