Practice Note: “I'm Sorry”, Said <scp>ChatGPT</scp>: Without a Self and Without Remorse—Useful for Conflict Resolution Nonetheless? A Case Study on Apologies in Mediation

ABSTRACT In this case study of a conversation with ChatGPT on the dynamics of apologies in mediation in general – and also about the dynamic of apologies within our conversation – I present my preliminary reflections on the potential and the limitations of using AI as a practitioner and teacher of conflict resolution: Does talking to a chatbot satisfy the expectation of a cognitively interesting (even inspiring) and factually appropriate exchange on a professional level? Does the communication as a process fulfill basic requirements to a useful professional exchange? From the analysis of this case and based on excerpts of the exchange, it seems reasonable to expect the possibility of a fairly meaningful and interesting exchange on relevant professional topics in conflict resolution – as long as one is willing and able to apply what I would term the “Triple P in dealing with ChatGPT”: Precision, proficiency, and perseverance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21460
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice Note: “I'm Sorry”, Said ChatGPT: Without a Self and Without Remorse—Useful for Conflict Resolution Nonetheless? A Case Study on Apologies in Mediation

Kirsten Schroeter
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Practice Note: “I'm Sorry”, Said ChatGPT: Without a Self and Without Remorse—Useful for Conflict Resolution Nonetheless? A Case Study on Apologies in Mediation

Kirsten Schroeter
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this case study of a conversation with ChatGPT on the dynamics of apologies in mediation in general – and also about the dynamic of apologies within our conversation – I present my preliminary reflections on the potential and the limitations of using AI as a practitioner and teacher of conflict resolution: Does talking to a chatbot satisfy the expectation of a cognitively interesting (even inspiring) and factually appropriate exchange on a professional level? Does the communication as a process fulfill basic requirements to a useful professional exchange? From the analysis of this case and based on excerpts of the exchange, it seems reasonable to expect the possibility of a fairly meaningful and interesting exchange on relevant professional topics in conflict resolution – as long as one is willing and able to apply what I would term the “Triple P in dealing with ChatGPT”: Precision, proficiency, and perseverance.

Conflict Resolution QuarterlyVol. 42(4)
European University Viadrina (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.