Hiring With a Bias: How Government Ideology Shapes Professional Bureaucratic Composition

An understudied aspect of patronage practices worldwide is how the ideological leaning of governments shapes the professional composition of the bureaucracy. This article explores this question, aiming to determine whether left-wing and right-wing administrations differ in their preferences for hiring from various academic or professional disciplines. Using Chile as a case study, we leverage a rich individual-level dataset of bureaucrats’ careers, covering nearly 15,000 upper- and upper-middle-level bureaucratic hires from 2010 to 2020 across nearly all central government ministries. Utilizing mixed-effects logistic regression models, we find that left-wing governments substantially increase the hiring of social scientists, while right-wing governments favor economists and elite management professionals. These distinct hiring patterns affect top and upper-middle-ranking positions and are not confined to specific agencies or ministries. These results underscore the significant impact of government ideology on the professional composition of bureaucracies, with potentially substantive impacts on policy design and implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies Review
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299241307213
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hiring With a Bias: How Government Ideology Shapes Professional Bureaucratic Composition

Mauricio Herrera, Daniel Brieba
1 citations
Political Studies Review
Academic Freedom and Politics
2.23
article

Hiring With a Bias: How Government Ideology Shapes Professional Bureaucratic Composition

Mauricio Herrera, Daniel Brieba
article en
1 citations

Abstract

An understudied aspect of patronage practices worldwide is how the ideological leaning of governments shapes the professional composition of the bureaucracy. This article explores this question, aiming to determine whether left-wing and right-wing administrations differ in their preferences for hiring from various academic or professional disciplines. Using Chile as a case study, we leverage a rich individual-level dataset of bureaucrats’ careers, covering nearly 15,000 upper- and upper-middle-level bureaucratic hires from 2010 to 2020 across nearly all central government ministries. Utilizing mixed-effects logistic regression models, we find that left-wing governments substantially increase the hiring of social scientists, while right-wing governments favor economists and elite management professionals. These distinct hiring patterns affect top and upper-middle-ranking positions and are not confined to specific agencies or ministries. These results underscore the significant impact of government ideology on the professional composition of bureaucracies, with potentially substantive impacts on policy design and implementation.

Political Studies ReviewVol. 24(1)
Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), Adolfo Ibáñez University (CL)
Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Academic Freedom and Politics
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.