Evaluation of an integrated substance use and trauma stabilisation group intervention as part of substance use addiction recovery

There is high comorbidity between psychological trauma and substance use difficulties (SUD), the treatment of which presents a challenge to current service structures. Research evidence and policy advocates for integrated treatments. This paper reports an evaluation of an integrated SUD and trauma stabilisation group intervention (i-SUD-TS-GI), developed and delivered within a drug and alcohol service. The evaluation aimed to investigate whether this intervention was feasible, acceptable and effective in reducing SUD and trauma symptomatology, and whether such an intervention could be delivered by non-psychologist staff. The intervention was trialled twice. Measures of trauma symptoms, recovery from SUD and psychological distress were captured at the start and end, then at six month follow-up. Participants were invited to attend a focus group to feed back their experiences at six month follow-up. Eight participants completed the intervention. Given the limited sample size, statistical conclusions cannot be drawn regarding effectiveness of the intervention, however, trends in the data show desired outcomes in SUD and trauma symptoms. Analysis of focus group data produced themes of perceptions of safety and security, the journey to healing, the development of compassion, a life changing experience, and challenges to efficacy and experience. In relation to this last theme, a key factor was the high rate of drop-out from the intervention. The findings suggest that an i-SUD-TR-GI was feasible and acceptable. Sample size limits statistical conclusions about effectiveness, however, trends in the data are promising. Together, findings show the perceived value of running an i-SUD-TR-GI and the direct input of practitioner psychologists as part of this.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychology Forum
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.382.38
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of an integrated substance use and trauma stabilisation group intervention as part of substance use addiction recovery

Louise Martin, Lynn Dalrymple, Amy C. Brown
Clinical Psychology Forum
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

Evaluation of an integrated substance use and trauma stabilisation group intervention as part of substance use addiction recovery

Louise Martin, Lynn Dalrymple, Amy C. Brown
article en

Abstract

There is high comorbidity between psychological trauma and substance use difficulties (SUD), the treatment of which presents a challenge to current service structures. Research evidence and policy advocates for integrated treatments. This paper reports an evaluation of an integrated SUD and trauma stabilisation group intervention (i-SUD-TS-GI), developed and delivered within a drug and alcohol service. The evaluation aimed to investigate whether this intervention was feasible, acceptable and effective in reducing SUD and trauma symptomatology, and whether such an intervention could be delivered by non-psychologist staff. The intervention was trialled twice. Measures of trauma symptoms, recovery from SUD and psychological distress were captured at the start and end, then at six month follow-up. Participants were invited to attend a focus group to feed back their experiences at six month follow-up. Eight participants completed the intervention. Given the limited sample size, statistical conclusions cannot be drawn regarding effectiveness of the intervention, however, trends in the data show desired outcomes in SUD and trauma symptoms. Analysis of focus group data produced themes of perceptions of safety and security, the journey to healing, the development of compassion, a life changing experience, and challenges to efficacy and experience. In relation to this last theme, a key factor was the high rate of drop-out from the intervention. The findings suggest that an i-SUD-TR-GI was feasible and acceptable. Sample size limits statistical conclusions about effectiveness, however, trends in the data are promising. Together, findings show the perceived value of running an i-SUD-TR-GI and the direct input of practitioner psychologists as part of this.

Clinical Psychology ForumVol. 1(382)
John Brown University (US), North East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.