Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice

Only 54.7% of patients completed their mt-sDNA test order. Older individuals were more likely to complete testing and test positive. Black patients were less likely to complete testing and, unexpectedly, less likely to test positive. Further exploration of mt-sDNA utilization including better understanding of the determinants of uptake, appropriateness, and evaluation of outcomes at colonoscopy is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003276
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice

Ravy K. Vajravelu, Robert E. Schoen, Melissa Saul, Keming Yang et al.
3 citations
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
1.72
article

Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice

Ravy K. Vajravelu, Robert E. Schoen, Melissa Saul, Keming Yang, L. Jiang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Only 54.7% of patients completed their mt-sDNA test order. Older individuals were more likely to complete testing and test positive. Black patients were less likely to complete testing and, unexpectedly, less likely to test positive. Further exploration of mt-sDNA utilization including better understanding of the determinants of uptake, appropriateness, and evaluation of outcomes at colonoscopy is needed.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10)
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Michigan (US), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.