Exploring mental health professionals’ experience, training, and clinical preparedness to provide care for LGBTQIA+ individuals

Introduction. LGBTQIA+ individuals face disproportionately high levels of mental health challenges, exacerbated by discrimination, stigma, and inadequate care from untrained mental health professionals. Despite evolving societal attitudes, barriers to accessing mental health care persist, mainly due to professionals’ lack of formal training in LGBTQIA+ affirmative care. This study examines the training, experience, and self-perceived clinical preparedness of mental health professionals in providing care to LGBTQIA+ individuals. Methods. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 68 mental health professionals, including clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and psychology trainees. The survey assessed their formal training in LGBTQIA+ mental health care, years of clinical experience, and self-perceived preparedness to provide affirmative care. Results. The survey revealed that many participants (n = 54, 79.4%) lacked formal LGBTQIA+ affirmative training, and many (n = 53, 77.9%) reported feeling inadequately prepared to provide care for LGBTQIA+ individuals. A significant positive correlation was found between clinical experience and self-perceived preparedness (r = 0.240, p < 0.05), but no significant correlation was identified between formal training and preparedness. This unexpected result may be due to the limited scope or insufficient depth of the existing training programs or the lack of continued supervision following introductory training. Conclusion. This study highlights the urgent need for structured LGBTQIA+ affirmative care training in mental health education. Integrating such training into national curricula and licensing programs is essential. Future research should explore broader populations and the specific elements of training that contribute most to clinical preparedness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56984/8zg020c1jzr
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring mental health professionals’ experience, training, and clinical preparedness to provide care for LGBTQIA+ individuals

Shenbaga Sundaram Subramanian, Sri Janani Vasanth Marar, Ilakkiya Lakshmanan, C.N Ramgopal
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Exploring mental health professionals’ experience, training, and clinical preparedness to provide care for LGBTQIA+ individuals

Shenbaga Sundaram Subramanian, Sri Janani Vasanth Marar, Ilakkiya Lakshmanan, C.N Ramgopal
article en

Abstract

Introduction. LGBTQIA+ individuals face disproportionately high levels of mental health challenges, exacerbated by discrimination, stigma, and inadequate care from untrained mental health professionals. Despite evolving societal attitudes, barriers to accessing mental health care persist, mainly due to professionals’ lack of formal training in LGBTQIA+ affirmative care. This study examines the training, experience, and self-perceived clinical preparedness of mental health professionals in providing care to LGBTQIA+ individuals. Methods. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 68 mental health professionals, including clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and psychology trainees. The survey assessed their formal training in LGBTQIA+ mental health care, years of clinical experience, and self-perceived preparedness to provide affirmative care. Results. The survey revealed that many participants (n = 54, 79.4%) lacked formal LGBTQIA+ affirmative training, and many (n = 53, 77.9%) reported feeling inadequately prepared to provide care for LGBTQIA+ individuals. A significant positive correlation was found between clinical experience and self-perceived preparedness (r = 0.240, p < 0.05), but no significant correlation was identified between formal training and preparedness. This unexpected result may be due to the limited scope or insufficient depth of the existing training programs or the lack of continued supervision following introductory training. Conclusion. This study highlights the urgent need for structured LGBTQIA+ affirmative care training in mental health education. Integrating such training into national curricula and licensing programs is essential. Future research should explore broader populations and the specific elements of training that contribute most to clinical preparedness.

Vol. 24(5)
Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (IN), SRM University (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.