Recommended Opioid Receptor Tool Compounds: Comparative <i>In Vitro</i> for Receptor Selectivity Profiles and <i>In Vivo</i> for Pharmacological Antinociceptive Profiles

Opioid agonist ligands bind opioid receptors and stimulate downstream signaling cascades for various biological processes including pain and reward. Historically, before cloning the receptors, muscle contraction assays using isolated organ tissues were used followed by radiolabel ligand binding assays on native tissues. Upon cloning of the opioid G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), cell assays using transfected opioid receptor DNA plasmids became the standard practice including <sup>35</sup>S-GTPγS functional and cAMP based assays. A number of research laboratories have studied key "tool" reference opioid receptor ligands for decades and used them as control reference compounds. Some, but not all, of these commonly used tool compounds have been characterized and compared side by side in parallel assays for selectivity profiles at the different human opioid receptors isoforms. Herein, we performed the standard FLIPR calcium mobilization assay using HEK293 cells engineered to stably express the Gα<sub>Δ6qi4myr</sub> in parallel, at human MOR, KOR, DOR, and NOP opioid receptors. The following tool compounds: morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone, DAMGO, DPDPE, U69593, deltorphin II, and nociceptin, were examined herein. These included the substance use disorder (SUD) compounds morphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone. Additionally, the antagonist tool compounds naloxone, NTI, norBNI, and β-FNA were assayed in parallel at the human MOR, KOR, DOR, and NOP opioid receptors. Furthermore, the agonist tool compounds were tested in the same <i>in vivo</i> tail-flick antinociception assays via intrathecal injection for ED<sub>50</sub> potencies. These data provide both <i>in vitro</i> comparative pharmacology as a reference for cellular activities and <i>in vivo</i> antinociception profiles for these tool compounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.4c00604
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommended Opioid Receptor Tool Compounds: Comparative In Vitro for Receptor Selectivity Profiles and In Vivo for Pharmacological Antinociceptive Profiles

Katie T. Freeman, Mary M. Lunzer, Philip S. Portoghese, Carrie Haskell‐Luevano et al.
2 citations
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
0.54
article

Recommended Opioid Receptor Tool Compounds: Comparative In Vitro for Receptor Selectivity Profiles and In Vivo for Pharmacological Antinociceptive Profiles

Katie T. Freeman, Mary M. Lunzer, Philip S. Portoghese, Carrie Haskell‐Luevano, Linh T. Tran
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Opioid agonist ligands bind opioid receptors and stimulate downstream signaling cascades for various biological processes including pain and reward. Historically, before cloning the receptors, muscle contraction assays using isolated organ tissues were used followed by radiolabel ligand binding assays on native tissues. Upon cloning of the opioid G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), cell assays using transfected opioid receptor DNA plasmids became the standard practice including <sup>35</sup>S-GTPγS functional and cAMP based assays. A number of research laboratories have studied key "tool" reference opioid receptor ligands for decades and used them as control reference compounds. Some, but not all, of these commonly used tool compounds have been characterized and compared side by side in parallel assays for selectivity profiles at the different human opioid receptors isoforms. Herein, we performed the standard FLIPR calcium mobilization assay using HEK293 cells engineered to stably express the Gα<sub>Δ6qi4myr</sub> in parallel, at human MOR, KOR, DOR, and NOP opioid receptors. The following tool compounds: morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone, DAMGO, DPDPE, U69593, deltorphin II, and nociceptin, were examined herein. These included the substance use disorder (SUD) compounds morphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone. Additionally, the antagonist tool compounds naloxone, NTI, norBNI, and β-FNA were assayed in parallel at the human MOR, KOR, DOR, and NOP opioid receptors. Furthermore, the agonist tool compounds were tested in the same <i>in vivo</i> tail-flick antinociception assays via intrathecal injection for ED<sub>50</sub> potencies. These data provide both <i>in vitro</i> comparative pharmacology as a reference for cellular activities and <i>in vivo</i> antinociception profiles for these tool compounds.

ACS Pharmacology & Translational ScienceVol. 8(1)
University of Minnesota (US)
University of Minnesota, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.