Direct Immunofluorescence in Dermatomyositis and Lupus Erythematosus: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation With Serologies and Other Features of Systemic Disease

This is a retrospective cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study of direct immunofluorescence (DIF) performed on a group of potential lupus erythematosus (LE)/dermatomyositis (DM) skin biopsies from 2015 to 2020 at a large, academic medical center. For purposes of this study, which was focused primarily on detection of LE/DM-related interface dermatitis, DIF was considered positive for a LE/DM pattern if it showed granular deposition of immunoglobulin G, with or without C3, at the basement membrane zone on the final pathology report. Blinded clinicopathologic correlation was the reference standard. One thousand fifty-eight sequential pairs of skin biopsies obtained from adults and submitted for both DIF and routine histology were screened. Cases were excluded if histopathology did not demonstrate features that could be consistent with LE/DM (broadly predefined as interface dermatitis and/or neutrophilic dermatosis), resulting in 254 cases of possible LE/DM eruptions for further analysis. Sensitivity of DIF with an immunoglobulin G granular pattern at the basement membrane zone was 71.4% (confidence interval 55.4%-84.3%) in LE-related and 59.3% (confidence interval 38.8%-77.6%) in DM-related eruptions. No statistically significant difference was found in sensitivities of DIF between LE and DM ( P = 0.3). DIF positivity did not correlate with available key demographic, clinical, and serologic features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Dermatopathology
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/dad.0000000000002897
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct Immunofluorescence in Dermatomyositis and Lupus Erythematosus: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation With Serologies and Other Features of Systemic Disease

Heidi Vaughan, Anna Haemel, Rebecca Jacobson, Jeffrey P. North et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Dermatopathology
Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
0.39
article

Direct Immunofluorescence in Dermatomyositis and Lupus Erythematosus: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation With Serologies and Other Features of Systemic Disease

Heidi Vaughan, Anna Haemel, Rebecca Jacobson, Jeffrey P. North, Ritesh Agnihothri, M. Kari Connolly, Maha Kazmi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This is a retrospective cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study of direct immunofluorescence (DIF) performed on a group of potential lupus erythematosus (LE)/dermatomyositis (DM) skin biopsies from 2015 to 2020 at a large, academic medical center. For purposes of this study, which was focused primarily on detection of LE/DM-related interface dermatitis, DIF was considered positive for a LE/DM pattern if it showed granular deposition of immunoglobulin G, with or without C3, at the basement membrane zone on the final pathology report. Blinded clinicopathologic correlation was the reference standard. One thousand fifty-eight sequential pairs of skin biopsies obtained from adults and submitted for both DIF and routine histology were screened. Cases were excluded if histopathology did not demonstrate features that could be consistent with LE/DM (broadly predefined as interface dermatitis and/or neutrophilic dermatosis), resulting in 254 cases of possible LE/DM eruptions for further analysis. Sensitivity of DIF with an immunoglobulin G granular pattern at the basement membrane zone was 71.4% (confidence interval 55.4%-84.3%) in LE-related and 59.3% (confidence interval 38.8%-77.6%) in DM-related eruptions. No statistically significant difference was found in sensitivities of DIF between LE and DM ( P = 0.3). DIF positivity did not correlate with available key demographic, clinical, and serologic features.

American Journal of DermatopathologyVol. 47(2)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Virginia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.