Comparing Statistical and Machine Learning Methods for Time Series Forecasting in Data-Driven Logistics—A Simulation Study

Many planning and decision activities in logistics and supply chain management are based on forecasts of multiple time dependent factors. Therefore, the quality of planning depends on the quality of the forecasts. We compare different state-of-the-art forecasting methods in terms of forecasting performance. Differently from most existing research in logistics, we do not perform this in a case-dependent way but consider a broad set of simulated time series to give more general recommendations. We therefore simulate various linear and nonlinear time series that reflect different situations. Our simulation results showed that the machine learning methods, especially Random Forests, performed particularly well in complex scenarios, with the differentiated time series training significantly improving the robustness of the model. In addition, the time series approaches proved to be competitive in low noise scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entropy
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/e27010025
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Statistical and Machine Learning Methods for Time Series Forecasting in Data-Driven Logistics—A Simulation Study

Markus Pauly, Moritz Roidl, Alice Kirchheim, Lena Schmid
17 citations
Entropy
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
8.34
article

Comparing Statistical and Machine Learning Methods for Time Series Forecasting in Data-Driven Logistics—A Simulation Study

Markus Pauly, Moritz Roidl, Alice Kirchheim, Lena Schmid
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Many planning and decision activities in logistics and supply chain management are based on forecasts of multiple time dependent factors. Therefore, the quality of planning depends on the quality of the forecasts. We compare different state-of-the-art forecasting methods in terms of forecasting performance. Differently from most existing research in logistics, we do not perform this in a case-dependent way but consider a broad set of simulated time series to give more general recommendations. We therefore simulate various linear and nonlinear time series that reflect different situations. Our simulation results showed that the machine learning methods, especially Random Forests, performed particularly well in complex scenarios, with the differentiated time series training significantly improving the robustness of the model. In addition, the time series approaches proved to be competitive in low noise scenarios.

EntropyVol. 27(1)
TU Dortmund University (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
8.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.