Role of Ruthenium in Modified CeNi<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>Ru<sub><i>x</i></sub>O<sub>3</sub> Perovskite Catalysts for the Bireforming of Methane

The study on modifying catalytic properties by partially substituting nickel with ruthenium on the perovskite precursor CeNiO3 has been conducted in this work. Catalysts were synthesized using a coprecipitation method, and their physicochemical properties were evaluated through analytical techniques, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR), CO2 temperature-programmed desorption (CO2-TPD), and Raman spectroscopy. Additionally, thermogravimetric analysis coupled with differential scanning calorimetry (TGA-DSC) and XRD were employed to assess the carbon deposition and coke type on the catalyst after 100 h TOS. All ruthenium-modified CeNi1–xRuxO3 (x = 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10) catalysts showed good activity with CH4 and CO2 conversion rates exceeding 90% at 700 °C. Ru modification facilitated the incorporation of Ni and Ru into the ceria lattice, resulting in the formation of Ru–O–Ce and Ni–O–Ce bonds, which significantly enhanced the catalyst’s sintering resistance and Ni reducibility. Moreover, the Ru-modified catalyst exhibited a considerable increase in specific surface area, reduced Ni crystallite size, emergence of highly active basic sites, and an increase in oxygen vacancies. However, excessively loading Ru lowers the Ni dispersion, resulting in metal agglomeration and decreased catalytic activity. The optimal substitution ratio of Ru was determined to be 0.05. Catalyst CeNi0.95Ru0.05O3 showed the highest BRM activity with conversion of both CH4 and CO2 of approximately 95% at 700 °C, compared to 88 and 90%, respectively, for CeNiO3 catalysts. The CeNi0.95Ru0.05O3 catalyst maintained good stability after 100 h of reaction with a 3 times lower coke accumulation rate compared to bare CeNiO3 perovskite. Thus, partially substituting Ru into the perovskite structure of CeNiO3 emerges as an effective strategy to improve the activity, durability, coke resistance, and sintering of the Ni catalyst in methane reforming reactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04915
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Ruthenium in Modified CeNi1–xRuxO3 Perovskite Catalysts for the Bireforming of Methane

Tri Nguyen, Dunpin Hong, Ba Long, Lưu Cẩm Lộc et al.
3 citations
Energy & Fuels
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
0.35
article

Role of Ruthenium in Modified CeNi1–xRuxO3 Perovskite Catalysts for the Bireforming of Methane

Tri Nguyen, Dunpin Hong, Ba Long, Lưu Cẩm Lộc, Ha Cam Anh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The study on modifying catalytic properties by partially substituting nickel with ruthenium on the perovskite precursor CeNiO3 has been conducted in this work. Catalysts were synthesized using a coprecipitation method, and their physicochemical properties were evaluated through analytical techniques, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR), CO2 temperature-programmed desorption (CO2-TPD), and Raman spectroscopy. Additionally, thermogravimetric analysis coupled with differential scanning calorimetry (TGA-DSC) and XRD were employed to assess the carbon deposition and coke type on the catalyst after 100 h TOS. All ruthenium-modified CeNi1–xRuxO3 (x = 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10) catalysts showed good activity with CH4 and CO2 conversion rates exceeding 90% at 700 °C. Ru modification facilitated the incorporation of Ni and Ru into the ceria lattice, resulting in the formation of Ru–O–Ce and Ni–O–Ce bonds, which significantly enhanced the catalyst’s sintering resistance and Ni reducibility. Moreover, the Ru-modified catalyst exhibited a considerable increase in specific surface area, reduced Ni crystallite size, emergence of highly active basic sites, and an increase in oxygen vacancies. However, excessively loading Ru lowers the Ni dispersion, resulting in metal agglomeration and decreased catalytic activity. The optimal substitution ratio of Ru was determined to be 0.05. Catalyst CeNi0.95Ru0.05O3 showed the highest BRM activity with conversion of both CH4 and CO2 of approximately 95% at 700 °C, compared to 88 and 90%, respectively, for CeNiO3 catalysts. The CeNi0.95Ru0.05O3 catalyst maintained good stability after 100 h of reaction with a 3 times lower coke accumulation rate compared to bare CeNiO3 perovskite. Thus, partially substituting Ru into the perovskite structure of CeNiO3 emerges as an effective strategy to improve the activity, durability, coke resistance, and sintering of the Ni catalyst in methane reforming reactions.

Energy & FuelsVol. 39(2)
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VN), Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (VN), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VN)
Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.