Testing for a difference in means of a single feature after clustering

For many applications, it is critical to interpret and validate groups of observations obtained via clustering. A common interpretation and validation approach involves testing differences in feature means between observations in two estimated clusters. In this setting, classical hypothesis tests lead to an inflated Type I error rate. To overcome this problem, we propose a new test for the difference in means in a single feature between a pair of clusters obtained using hierarchical or k-means clustering. The test controls the selective Type I error rate in finite samples and can be efficiently computed. We further illustrate the validity and power of our proposal in simulation and demonstrate its use on single-cell RNA-sequencing data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biostatistics
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxae046
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing for a difference in means of a single feature after clustering

Yiqun T. Chen, Lucy L. Gao
1 citations
Biostatistics
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
0.23
article

Testing for a difference in means of a single feature after clustering

Yiqun T. Chen, Lucy L. Gao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For many applications, it is critical to interpret and validate groups of observations obtained via clustering. A common interpretation and validation approach involves testing differences in feature means between observations in two estimated clusters. In this setting, classical hypothesis tests lead to an inflated Type I error rate. To overcome this problem, we propose a new test for the difference in means in a single feature between a pair of clusters obtained using hierarchical or k-means clustering. The test controls the selective Type I error rate in finite samples and can be efficiently computed. We further illustrate the validity and power of our proposal in simulation and demonstrate its use on single-cell RNA-sequencing data.

BiostatisticsVol. 26(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), Stanford University (US)
National Institutes of Health, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
0.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.