Validation of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM-R) in rural contexts in South Africa
<i>Introduction:</i> Resilience is central to young children's healthy and happy development. The Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM-R) has been widely used in several countries. However, its construct validity among young children in rural South Africa has not been examined. We investigated the construct structure of the CYRM-R for foundation-phase learners (i.e., grades R/0-3) in rural primary schools in South Africa.<i>Methods:</i> The CYRM-R was translated into the local language Setswana and tested on 1 088 learners attending 10 schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged rural communities in the North West province. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to validate the CYRM-R scale and examine its construct structure.<i>Results:</i> Our findings suggested a two-factor (i.e., personal resilience, caregiver resilience) structure of the CYRM-R with some items removed or reclassified as preferable or relative to other examined solutions. CFA results showed that the optimal model represents a good fit to the data (RMSEA = 0.037, CFI = 0.929, TFI = 0.915), explaining 83.4% of the variance.<i>Conclusion:</i> The Setswana version of the CYRM-R is a reliable and valid measure of resilience in young children in a rural South African context and can be used to assess resilience in young children in Setswana-speaking populations.
Authors
- Liesel Ebersöhn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-4973)
- Qing Gu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5948-4690)
- Patrick Callaghan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3175-5361)
- Huiming Ding (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5747-7796)
Institutions
- London South Bank University (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health
- Published
- 2024-12-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2989/17280583.2024.2438368
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Resilience and Mental Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.64
Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council