Assessing Thermal Comfort and Indoor Air Quality: In an Educational Facility of a Semi-Arid Climate Zone

There are three main approaches to human thermal comfort; a psychological approach, a thermo-physiological approach, and an approach based on human energy balance. According to the ISO 7730 and ASHRAE Standard 55-2023 standards, the psychological approach defines thermal comfort as a mental state in which individuals feel satisfied with their surrounding environment. According to this definition, thermal comfort is very subjective and may vary between individuals, as well as according to the environment and climate. This study aimed to evaluate the thermal comfort levels of students in primary and high school classrooms situated within the semi-arid climatic conditions of Şanlıurfa. For this purpose, 15 Temmuz Şehitleri Secondary School, Kadir Evliyaoğlu College, and TOBB Science High School in Şanlıurfa were chosen as fieldwork locations. Within the scope of the study, the climatic conditions (classroom temperature, air velocity, humidity, radiant temperature, Tw, Tg carbon dioxide) were measured, and how the students felt under the thermal conditions of these classrooms was evaluated. The study encompasses both the heating season (winter) and the non-heating season (summer). Based on the findings obtained from the study, PMV (Predicted Mean Vote) and PPD (Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied) values and whether they are suitable thermal comfort for the people in these places tried to be determined by mathematical modeling and standards such as ASHRAE Standard 55-2023. While PMV values ranged between −0.58 (North) and 2.53 (East+South+West), PPD values were observed between 5% (South and some North facades) and 94% (East+South+West). While the South facade offers values close to the comfort range of 0.01–0.02 in terms of PMV, the East+South+West facade shows serious thermal discomfort with a PMV value of 2.53 and a PPD value of 94%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16010029
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Thermal Comfort and Indoor Air Quality: In an Educational Facility of a Semi-Arid Climate Zone

Mehmet İ̇rfan Yeşilnacar, Abdullah İzzeddin Karabulut, Kemalettin Parmaksiz
4 citations
Atmosphere
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.06
article

Assessing Thermal Comfort and Indoor Air Quality: In an Educational Facility of a Semi-Arid Climate Zone

Mehmet İ̇rfan Yeşilnacar, Abdullah İzzeddin Karabulut, Kemalettin Parmaksiz
article en
4 citations

Abstract

There are three main approaches to human thermal comfort; a psychological approach, a thermo-physiological approach, and an approach based on human energy balance. According to the ISO 7730 and ASHRAE Standard 55-2023 standards, the psychological approach defines thermal comfort as a mental state in which individuals feel satisfied with their surrounding environment. According to this definition, thermal comfort is very subjective and may vary between individuals, as well as according to the environment and climate. This study aimed to evaluate the thermal comfort levels of students in primary and high school classrooms situated within the semi-arid climatic conditions of Şanlıurfa. For this purpose, 15 Temmuz Şehitleri Secondary School, Kadir Evliyaoğlu College, and TOBB Science High School in Şanlıurfa were chosen as fieldwork locations. Within the scope of the study, the climatic conditions (classroom temperature, air velocity, humidity, radiant temperature, Tw, Tg carbon dioxide) were measured, and how the students felt under the thermal conditions of these classrooms was evaluated. The study encompasses both the heating season (winter) and the non-heating season (summer). Based on the findings obtained from the study, PMV (Predicted Mean Vote) and PPD (Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied) values and whether they are suitable thermal comfort for the people in these places tried to be determined by mathematical modeling and standards such as ASHRAE Standard 55-2023. While PMV values ranged between −0.58 (North) and 2.53 (East+South+West), PPD values were observed between 5% (South and some North facades) and 94% (East+South+West). While the South facade offers values close to the comfort range of 0.01–0.02 in terms of PMV, the East+South+West facade shows serious thermal discomfort with a PMV value of 2.53 and a PPD value of 94%.

AtmosphereVol. 16(1)
Harran University (TR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.