Case 3878 – Andrena ovatula: proposed conservation of current usage by designation of a neotype for Melitta ovatula Kirby, 1802 (currently Andrena ovatula; Hymenoptera, Andrenidae)

The purpose of this application, under Article 75.5 of the ICZN Code, is to conserve the current usage of the specific name Andrena ovatula (Kirby, 1802) by setting aside all previous types and designating a neotype for Melitta ovatula. The name Andrena ovatula has been used as the senior name for what is a complex of species for more than 100 years. The principal confusion has been with Andrena afzeliella (Kirby, 1802), described from a female specimen, whereas Andrena ovatula was described from three male specimens. Within this group, males are morphologically more challenging to recognise than females, and as the existing male type material of A. ovatula possibly does not conform to the current use of A. ovatula, this poses a risk of nomenclatural instability. A female neotype is designated for Andrena ovatula, fixing the current interpretation of Andrena ovatula as distinct from A. afzeliella.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v81.a008
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case 3878 – Andrena ovatula: proposed conservation of current usage by designation of a neotype for Melitta ovatula Kirby, 1802 (currently Andrena ovatula; Hymenoptera, Andrenidae)

Thomas J. Wood, Christophe Praz
The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature
Plant and animal studies
article

Case 3878 – Andrena ovatula: proposed conservation of current usage by designation of a neotype for Melitta ovatula Kirby, 1802 (currently Andrena ovatula; Hymenoptera, Andrenidae)

Thomas J. Wood, Christophe Praz
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this application, under Article 75.5 of the ICZN Code, is to conserve the current usage of the specific name Andrena ovatula (Kirby, 1802) by setting aside all previous types and designating a neotype for Melitta ovatula. The name Andrena ovatula has been used as the senior name for what is a complex of species for more than 100 years. The principal confusion has been with Andrena afzeliella (Kirby, 1802), described from a female specimen, whereas Andrena ovatula was described from three male specimens. Within this group, males are morphologically more challenging to recognise than females, and as the existing male type material of A. ovatula possibly does not conform to the current use of A. ovatula, this poses a risk of nomenclatural instability. A female neotype is designated for Andrena ovatula, fixing the current interpretation of Andrena ovatula as distinct from A. afzeliella.

The Bulletin of zoological nomenclatureVol. 81(1)
Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL), University of Neuchâtel (CH)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.