House prices, endogenous productivity, and the effects of government spending shocks

We present aggregate and regional evidence showing that U.S. house prices increase persistently in response to positive shocks to fiscal spending. In sharp contrast to this, house prices decline in conventional dynamic general equilibrium models, where shocks that have short-lived effects on the shadow value of housing inevitably generate negative comovement between households’ marginal utility of consumption and house prices (see Barsky et al., 2007). In response to an increase in government spending, the negative wealth effect exerted by the simultaneous increase in the present-value tax burden increases the marginal utility of consumption. Even overcoming the consumption crowding-out puzzle is not sufficient to resolve this shortcoming. To tackle this problem, we extend an otherwise standard model embedding a lender-borrower relationship with alternative – yet, potentially complementary – propagation channels that leverage the expansion in total factor productivity stemming from a positive shock to fiscal spending, so as to contrast the negative wealth effect of higher taxes. This class of models succeeds in generating a persistent expansion in house prices, although the propagation required to match the data is stronger – in some cases significantly so – than what is typically found in the literature. The positive interplay between house prices and productivity finds support in both aggregate and regional data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Economic Review
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104937
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

House prices, endogenous productivity, and the effects of government spending shocks

Rasmus Bisgaard Larsen, Søren Hove Ravn, Emiliano Santoro
1 citations
European Economic Review
Housing Market and Economics
1.13
article

House prices, endogenous productivity, and the effects of government spending shocks

Rasmus Bisgaard Larsen, Søren Hove Ravn, Emiliano Santoro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We present aggregate and regional evidence showing that U.S. house prices increase persistently in response to positive shocks to fiscal spending. In sharp contrast to this, house prices decline in conventional dynamic general equilibrium models, where shocks that have short-lived effects on the shadow value of housing inevitably generate negative comovement between households’ marginal utility of consumption and house prices (see Barsky et al., 2007). In response to an increase in government spending, the negative wealth effect exerted by the simultaneous increase in the present-value tax burden increases the marginal utility of consumption. Even overcoming the consumption crowding-out puzzle is not sufficient to resolve this shortcoming. To tackle this problem, we extend an otherwise standard model embedding a lender-borrower relationship with alternative – yet, potentially complementary – propagation channels that leverage the expansion in total factor productivity stemming from a positive shock to fiscal spending, so as to contrast the negative wealth effect of higher taxes. This class of models succeeds in generating a persistent expansion in house prices, although the propagation required to match the data is stronger – in some cases significantly so – than what is typically found in the literature. The positive interplay between house prices and productivity finds support in both aggregate and regional data.

European Economic ReviewVol. 172
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Milan (IT), Danmarks Nationalbank (DK)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Housing Market and Economics
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.