Evaluation of Dynamic Compaction Load Conversion Methods and Vibration Reduction Treatments

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of different dynamic compaction (DC) load equivalent conversion methods in DC vibration calculations. It also investigates the effect of vibration isolation treatments on the vibration reduction performance of loess foundations, with the goal of optimizing vibration control during DC construction. Five classical methods were used to convert the DC loads into time-dependent surface loads, which were subsequently fed into Plaxis’s dynamic multiplier table for the numerical implementation of DC tests. By comparing the numerical simulation results with in situ monitoring data from a loess site, the accuracy of the five DC load equivalent conversion methods was evaluated. The momentum theorem method was identified as the most precise for both vibration velocity and settlement. Subsequently, the momentum theorem method was utilized to investigate the influence of depth and distance of vibration isolation trench, as well as the properties of vibration isolation materials on vibration reduction effect. It is indicated that the optimal depth for the vibration isolation trench of the loess site is 2 m, beyond which the improvement in vibration reduction effects is not notable. The excavation distance of the vibration isolation trench should be set as close as possible to the boundary of the construction site to achieve the best vibration reduction effect. As for the properties of vibration isolation materials, it is shown that the unit weight and damping ratio of the filling material have a significant effect on the vibration reduction effect, while the influence of the shear strength of the filling material is negligible. Besides the vibrating reduction influence of filling materials, utilizing spring dampers has a better vibration reduction effect. Increasing the stiffness of the spring dampers and reducing their spacing can significantly enhance the vibration reduction effect. In practical engineering applications, it is essential to consider both the effects and economic costs to select the optimal vibration reduction treatment and its parameters. This study provides a scientific basis for vibration control during DC construction, contributing to ensuring construction safety and efficiency while minimizing the impact on the surrounding environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15010111
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Dynamic Compaction Load Conversion Methods and Vibration Reduction Treatments

Jixuan Li, Jun Liang Hu, Wenli Wang, Longfu Luo et al.
2 citations
Buildings
Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
0.52
article

Evaluation of Dynamic Compaction Load Conversion Methods and Vibration Reduction Treatments

Jixuan Li, Jun Liang Hu, Wenli Wang, Longfu Luo, Xiaoliang Yao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of different dynamic compaction (DC) load equivalent conversion methods in DC vibration calculations. It also investigates the effect of vibration isolation treatments on the vibration reduction performance of loess foundations, with the goal of optimizing vibration control during DC construction. Five classical methods were used to convert the DC loads into time-dependent surface loads, which were subsequently fed into Plaxis’s dynamic multiplier table for the numerical implementation of DC tests. By comparing the numerical simulation results with in situ monitoring data from a loess site, the accuracy of the five DC load equivalent conversion methods was evaluated. The momentum theorem method was identified as the most precise for both vibration velocity and settlement. Subsequently, the momentum theorem method was utilized to investigate the influence of depth and distance of vibration isolation trench, as well as the properties of vibration isolation materials on vibration reduction effect. It is indicated that the optimal depth for the vibration isolation trench of the loess site is 2 m, beyond which the improvement in vibration reduction effects is not notable. The excavation distance of the vibration isolation trench should be set as close as possible to the boundary of the construction site to achieve the best vibration reduction effect. As for the properties of vibration isolation materials, it is shown that the unit weight and damping ratio of the filling material have a significant effect on the vibration reduction effect, while the influence of the shear strength of the filling material is negligible. Besides the vibrating reduction influence of filling materials, utilizing spring dampers has a better vibration reduction effect. Increasing the stiffness of the spring dampers and reducing their spacing can significantly enhance the vibration reduction effect. In practical engineering applications, it is essential to consider both the effects and economic costs to select the optimal vibration reduction treatment and its parameters. This study provides a scientific basis for vibration control during DC construction, contributing to ensuring construction safety and efficiency while minimizing the impact on the surrounding environment.

BuildingsVol. 15(1)
China Geological Survey (CN), Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.