Generating viewsheds based on the Digital Surface Model (DSM) and point cloud

Visual analysis has applications in diverse fields, including urban planning and environmental management. This study explores viewshed generation using two distinct datasets: Digital Surface Model (DSM) and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) point cloud data. We assess the differences in viewsheds derived from these sources, evaluating their respective strengths and weaknesses. The DSM accurately captures terrain features and elevation changes, offering a comprehensive view of the land surface. Conversely, LiDAR point cloud data delivers detailed three-dimensional information, enabling precise mapping of terrain features and object detection. Our comparative analysis based on six selected locations with varied topographical arrangements considers factors such as visual acuity and computational efficiency. Additionally, we discuss the application of DSM and LiDAR point cloud data in view analysis, emphasizing their value in line-of-sight assessments and field operations. The results indicate greater precision of viewsheds created based on LiDAR point clouds. The analysis reveals that the greater precision in comparing differences between DSM and point LiDAR data ranges from 1.42% to 5.94%, while the results subtraction falls between 1.05% and 3.89% for the conditions analyzed, indicating a high degree of accuracy in the method. However, this process demands significant computational resources. It is best applied in limited areas, particularly in urban environments where such data is crucial for supporting research decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312146
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generating viewsheds based on the Digital Surface Model (DSM) and point cloud

Agnieszka Ozimek, Jerzy Orlof, Adrian Widłak, Piotr Łabędź et al.
7 citations
PLoS ONE
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
1.44
article

Generating viewsheds based on the Digital Surface Model (DSM) and point cloud

Agnieszka Ozimek, Jerzy Orlof, Adrian Widłak, Piotr Łabędź, Paweł Ozimek
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Visual analysis has applications in diverse fields, including urban planning and environmental management. This study explores viewshed generation using two distinct datasets: Digital Surface Model (DSM) and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) point cloud data. We assess the differences in viewsheds derived from these sources, evaluating their respective strengths and weaknesses. The DSM accurately captures terrain features and elevation changes, offering a comprehensive view of the land surface. Conversely, LiDAR point cloud data delivers detailed three-dimensional information, enabling precise mapping of terrain features and object detection. Our comparative analysis based on six selected locations with varied topographical arrangements considers factors such as visual acuity and computational efficiency. Additionally, we discuss the application of DSM and LiDAR point cloud data in view analysis, emphasizing their value in line-of-sight assessments and field operations. The results indicate greater precision of viewsheds created based on LiDAR point clouds. The analysis reveals that the greater precision in comparing differences between DSM and point LiDAR data ranges from 1.42% to 5.94%, while the results subtraction falls between 1.05% and 3.89% for the conditions analyzed, indicating a high degree of accuracy in the method. However, this process demands significant computational resources. It is best applied in limited areas, particularly in urban environments where such data is crucial for supporting research decisions.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(12)
Cracow University of Technology (PL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
1.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.