Neurodidactics in university education

This paper presents an evaluation of neurodidactic strategies in the social sciences. To this end, two groups of analyses have been arranged, one control and the other experimental. On the one hand, traditional strategies were applied to the control group, and on the other, neurodidactic strategies were applied to the experimental group. Both groups maintained a permanent relationship with the teacher. In addition, a pre-test and a post-test were carried out to know the effects of the designed strategy, and to compare it with the classic methods. The main results showed a significant difference between both groups in all dimensions, however, it was not observed that this difference was large, demonstrating the need to incorporate both methods in the teaching and learning process, to achieve better results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Noesis
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47460/noesis.v1i2.7
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurodidactics in university education

Clemencia Magdalena Aguirre Pluas, Narcisa Isabel Cordero Alvarado
Noesis
Educational Methods and Psychological Studies
article

Neurodidactics in university education

Clemencia Magdalena Aguirre Pluas, Narcisa Isabel Cordero Alvarado
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation of neurodidactic strategies in the social sciences. To this end, two groups of analyses have been arranged, one control and the other experimental. On the one hand, traditional strategies were applied to the control group, and on the other, neurodidactic strategies were applied to the experimental group. Both groups maintained a permanent relationship with the teacher. In addition, a pre-test and a post-test were carried out to know the effects of the designed strategy, and to compare it with the classic methods. The main results showed a significant difference between both groups in all dimensions, however, it was not observed that this difference was large, demonstrating the need to incorporate both methods in the teaching and learning process, to achieve better results.

NoesisVol. 1(2)
Universidad Estatal de Milagro (EC)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Educational Methods and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Neurodidactics in university education — Clemencia Magdalena Aguirre Pluas, Narcisa Isabel Cordero Alvarado · Noesis (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS