Fuel Load Models for Different Tree Vegetation Types in Sichuan Province Based on Machine Learning

(1) Objective: To improve forest fire prevention, this study provides a reference for forest fire risk assessment in Sichuan Province. (2) Methods: This research focuses on various forest vegetation types in Sichuan Province. Given data from 6848 sample plots, five machine learning models—random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and stacking ensemble (Stacking)—were employed. Bayesian optimization was utilized for hyperparameter tuning, resulting in machine learning models for predicting forest fuel loads (FLs) across five different vegetation types. (3) Results: The FL model incorporates not only vegetation characteristics but also site conditions and climate data. Feature importance analysis indicated that structural factors (e.g., canopy closure, diameter at breast height, and tree height) dominated in cold broadleaf, subtropical broadleaf, and subtropical mixed forests, while climate factors (e.g., mean annual temperature and temperature seasonality) were more influential in cold coniferous and subtropical coniferous forests. Machine learning-based FL models outperform the multiple stepwise regression model in both fitting ability and prediction accuracy. The XGBoost model performed best for cold coniferous, cold broadleaf, subtropical broadleaf, and subtropical mixed forests, with coefficient of determination (R2) values of 0.79, 0.85, 0.81, and 0.83, respectively. The Stacking model excelled in subtropical coniferous forests, achieving an R2 value of 0.82. (4) Conclusions: This study establishes a theoretical foundation for predicting forest fuel capacity in Sichuan Province. It is recommended that the XGBoost model be applied to predict fuel loads (FLs) in cold coniferous forests, cold broadleaf forests, subtropical broadleaf forests, and subtropical mixed forests, while the Stacking model is suggested for predicting FLs in subtropical coniferous forests. Furthermore, this research offers theoretical support for forest fuel management, forest fire risk assessment, and forest fire prevention and control in Sichuan Province.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f16010042
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fuel Load Models for Different Tree Vegetation Types in Sichuan Province Based on Machine Learning

Hongrong Wang, H.F. Chen, Zhiqiang Min, Kai Chen et al.
1 citations
Forests
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.28
article

Fuel Load Models for Different Tree Vegetation Types in Sichuan Province Based on Machine Learning

Hongrong Wang, H.F. Chen, Zhiqiang Min, Kai Chen, Chen Dong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

(1) Objective: To improve forest fire prevention, this study provides a reference for forest fire risk assessment in Sichuan Province. (2) Methods: This research focuses on various forest vegetation types in Sichuan Province. Given data from 6848 sample plots, five machine learning models—random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and stacking ensemble (Stacking)—were employed. Bayesian optimization was utilized for hyperparameter tuning, resulting in machine learning models for predicting forest fuel loads (FLs) across five different vegetation types. (3) Results: The FL model incorporates not only vegetation characteristics but also site conditions and climate data. Feature importance analysis indicated that structural factors (e.g., canopy closure, diameter at breast height, and tree height) dominated in cold broadleaf, subtropical broadleaf, and subtropical mixed forests, while climate factors (e.g., mean annual temperature and temperature seasonality) were more influential in cold coniferous and subtropical coniferous forests. Machine learning-based FL models outperform the multiple stepwise regression model in both fitting ability and prediction accuracy. The XGBoost model performed best for cold coniferous, cold broadleaf, subtropical broadleaf, and subtropical mixed forests, with coefficient of determination (R2) values of 0.79, 0.85, 0.81, and 0.83, respectively. The Stacking model excelled in subtropical coniferous forests, achieving an R2 value of 0.82. (4) Conclusions: This study establishes a theoretical foundation for predicting forest fuel capacity in Sichuan Province. It is recommended that the XGBoost model be applied to predict fuel loads (FLs) in cold coniferous forests, cold broadleaf forests, subtropical broadleaf forests, and subtropical mixed forests, while the Stacking model is suggested for predicting FLs in subtropical coniferous forests. Furthermore, this research offers theoretical support for forest fuel management, forest fire risk assessment, and forest fire prevention and control in Sichuan Province.

ForestsVol. 16(1)
Zhejiang A & F University (CN), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.