Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool and a Universal Low-Cost Robotized Microscope for the Automated Diagnosis of Malaria

The gold standard diagnosis for malaria is the microscopic visualization of blood smears to identify <i>Plasmodium</i> parasites, although it is an expert-dependent technique and could trigger diagnostic errors. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on digital image analysis were postulated as a suitable supportive alternative for automated malaria diagnosis. A diagnostic evaluation of the <i>iMAGING</i> AI-based system was conducted in the reference laboratory of the International Health Unit Drassanes-Vall d'Hebron in Barcelona, Spain. <i>iMAGING</i> is an automated device for the diagnosis of malaria by using artificial intelligence image analysis tools and a robotized microscope. A total of 54 Giemsa-stained thick blood smear samples from travelers and migrants coming from endemic areas were employed and analyzed to determine the presence/absence of <i>Plasmodium</i> parasites. AI diagnostic results were compared with expert light microscopy gold standard method results. The AI system shows 81.25% sensitivity and 92.11% specificity when compared with the conventional light microscopy gold standard method. Overall, 48/54 (88.89%) samples were correctly identified [13/16 (81.25%) as positives and 35/38 (92.11%) as negatives]. The mean time of the AI system to determine a positive malaria diagnosis was 3 min and 48 s, with an average of 7.38 FoV analyzed per sample. Statistical analyses showed the Kappa Index = 0.721, demonstrating a satisfactory correlation between the gold standard diagnostic method and <i>iMAGING</i> results. The AI system demonstrated reliable results for malaria diagnosis in a reference laboratory in Barcelona. Validation in malaria-endemic regions will be the next step to evaluate its potential in resource-poor settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22010047
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool and a Universal Low-Cost Robotized Microscope for the Automated Diagnosis of Malaria

Daniel López, Elisa Sayrol, Elena Sulleiro, Lidia Goterris et al.
3 citations
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
0.75
article

Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Tool and a Universal Low-Cost Robotized Microscope for the Automated Diagnosis of Malaria

Daniel López, Elisa Sayrol, Elena Sulleiro, Lidia Goterris, Alejandro Mediavilla, Carles Rubio Maturana, Joan Joseph-Munné, Francesc Zarzuela, Aroa Silgado, Allisson Dantas de Oliveira, Alberto Abelló, Patricia Martínez-Vallejo, Anna Veiga, Marc Muixí
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The gold standard diagnosis for malaria is the microscopic visualization of blood smears to identify <i>Plasmodium</i> parasites, although it is an expert-dependent technique and could trigger diagnostic errors. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on digital image analysis were postulated as a suitable supportive alternative for automated malaria diagnosis. A diagnostic evaluation of the <i>iMAGING</i> AI-based system was conducted in the reference laboratory of the International Health Unit Drassanes-Vall d'Hebron in Barcelona, Spain. <i>iMAGING</i> is an automated device for the diagnosis of malaria by using artificial intelligence image analysis tools and a robotized microscope. A total of 54 Giemsa-stained thick blood smear samples from travelers and migrants coming from endemic areas were employed and analyzed to determine the presence/absence of <i>Plasmodium</i> parasites. AI diagnostic results were compared with expert light microscopy gold standard method results. The AI system shows 81.25% sensitivity and 92.11% specificity when compared with the conventional light microscopy gold standard method. Overall, 48/54 (88.89%) samples were correctly identified [13/16 (81.25%) as positives and 35/38 (92.11%) as negatives]. The mean time of the AI system to determine a positive malaria diagnosis was 3 min and 48 s, with an average of 7.38 FoV analyzed per sample. Statistical analyses showed the Kappa Index = 0.721, demonstrating a satisfactory correlation between the gold standard diagnostic method and <i>iMAGING</i> results. The AI system demonstrated reliable results for malaria diagnosis in a reference laboratory in Barcelona. Validation in malaria-endemic regions will be the next step to evaluate its potential in resource-poor settings.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 22(1)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Fundació Institut de Recerca Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.