Biotechnology and Intellectual Property: The Limits of Animal Patentability in the European Union

The study considers the possibility of patenting animal breeds as objects of intellectual property, taking into account the legislation and law enforcement practices of the European Union. It presents a retrospective analysis and detailed interpretation of the conventional and directive provisions related to the patent protection of animal breeds, and characterizes the differences between the latter and the microbiological process. It was observed that the position of the European Patent Office on this issue was not always unanimous, which was manifested in the contradictory interpretation of the relevant, not perfectly formulated, legislative norms. It was analyzed under what conditions the current position of the EU manifests itself in the fact that an animal breed, as a product of an exclusively biological process, cannot be subject to patent protection. In addition, the concepts of “biological” and “technical processes” were interpreted as additional criteria for patentability concerning living organisms. Attention was also paid to the ethical component of biotechnological inventions and the still problematic aspects of animal breeding as possible results of biotechnological activity were emphasized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of European and Comparative Law
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.17670
Primary Topic
Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biotechnology and Intellectual Property: The Limits of Animal Patentability in the European Union

Liliia Pankova, Mariia Golubei
Review of European and Comparative Law
Animal Genetics and Reproduction
article

Biotechnology and Intellectual Property: The Limits of Animal Patentability in the European Union

Liliia Pankova, Mariia Golubei
article en

Abstract

The study considers the possibility of patenting animal breeds as objects of intellectual property, taking into account the legislation and law enforcement practices of the European Union. It presents a retrospective analysis and detailed interpretation of the conventional and directive provisions related to the patent protection of animal breeds, and characterizes the differences between the latter and the microbiological process. It was observed that the position of the European Patent Office on this issue was not always unanimous, which was manifested in the contradictory interpretation of the relevant, not perfectly formulated, legislative norms. It was analyzed under what conditions the current position of the EU manifests itself in the fact that an animal breed, as a product of an exclusively biological process, cannot be subject to patent protection. In addition, the concepts of “biological” and “technical processes” were interpreted as additional criteria for patentability concerning living organisms. Attention was also paid to the ethical component of biotechnological inventions and the still problematic aspects of animal breeding as possible results of biotechnological activity were emphasized.

Review of European and Comparative LawVol. 59(4)
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine (UA), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Animal Genetics and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biotechnology and Intellectual Property: The Limits of Animal Patentability in the European Union — Liliia Pankova, Mariia Golubei · Review of European and Comparative Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS