Vehicle Detection with Orientation from Drones: A Comparison of Oriented-Based vs. Rotated-Based Detection Methods *

With the rapid development of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV s), object detection in aerial images has garnered increasing attention from both industry and academia. However, detecting objects in aerial images presents significant challenges due to their varying orientations. This work addresses these challenges by employing rotated and oriented object detection methods, which utilize rotated bounding boxes to detect objects. Our contributions are two-fold. First, we developed a dataset called UIT-Drones-OVD (Oriented Vehicle Detection) to evaluate orientation-based object detection methods. The dataset comprises 881 drone-captured aerial images and includes four categories: pedestrian, motorbike, car, and bus. Second, we conducted experiments on five state-of-the-art methods from two primary approaches: oriented-based methods and rotated-based methods. These methods are recognized for their effectiveness in detecting and localizing objects with various orientations, a critical capability in aerial imagery where objects often appear at arbitrary angles. Experimental results demonstrate that oriented-based methods consistently outperformed rotated-based methods in our tests, likely due to their ability to more accurately capture the complex orientations of objects in aerial images, while rotated-based methods rely on fixed bounding box orientations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccais63750.2024.10814389
Primary Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vehicle Detection with Orientation from Drones: A Comparison of Oriented-Based vs. Rotated-Based Detection Methods *

Tran Anh Dung, Khanh-Duy Nguyen, Tran Tue Tanh
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
article

Vehicle Detection with Orientation from Drones: A Comparison of Oriented-Based vs. Rotated-Based Detection Methods *

Tran Anh Dung, Khanh-Duy Nguyen, Tran Tue Tanh
article en

Abstract

With the rapid development of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV s), object detection in aerial images has garnered increasing attention from both industry and academia. However, detecting objects in aerial images presents significant challenges due to their varying orientations. This work addresses these challenges by employing rotated and oriented object detection methods, which utilize rotated bounding boxes to detect objects. Our contributions are two-fold. First, we developed a dataset called UIT-Drones-OVD (Oriented Vehicle Detection) to evaluate orientation-based object detection methods. The dataset comprises 881 drone-captured aerial images and includes four categories: pedestrian, motorbike, car, and bus. Second, we conducted experiments on five state-of-the-art methods from two primary approaches: oriented-based methods and rotated-based methods. These methods are recognized for their effectiveness in detecting and localizing objects with various orientations, a critical capability in aerial imagery where objects often appear at arbitrary angles. Experimental results demonstrate that oriented-based methods consistently outperformed rotated-based methods in our tests, likely due to their ability to more accurately capture the complex orientations of objects in aerial images, while rotated-based methods rely on fixed bounding box orientations.

Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.