The Impact of MSTN Gene Editing on Meat Quality and Metabolomics: A Comparative Study Among Three Breeds of MSTN-Edited and Non-Edited Cattle

Myostatin (MSTN) serves as a negative regulatory factor for muscle development. A reduction in MSTN gene expression can enhance muscle mass and increase meat production. However, whether it will impact meat quality traits remains one of the major concerns in the cattle breeding industry. To explore the meat quality traits of MSTN gene-edited cattle, this study compared the meat quality traits of three MSTN gene-edited cattle breeds with those of non-gene-edited cattle, including Luxi, Angus, and Mongolian cattle, and further conducted an analysis in combination with metabolomics. We found that MSTN gene-edited cattle were superior to non-gene-edited cattle in terms of meat pH, shear force, and intramuscular fat content. However, no significant differences were observed in water-holding capacity, water content, and protein content of the meat. Metabolomics analysis revealed three upregulated differential metabolites common to MSTN gene-edited and non-gene-edited cattle across three breeds, namely lactoyl-valine, 3-phenylactic acid, and lactoyl-methionine. Some studies have indicated that these metabolites can improve the meat's flavor. In this study, we compared the meat quality traits and metabolomics data between MSTN gene-edited and non-gene-edited cattle, and found that the meat quality of MSTN gene-edited cattle was superior to that of non-gene-edited cattle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15010047
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of MSTN Gene Editing on Meat Quality and Metabolomics: A Comparative Study Among Three Breeds of MSTN-Edited and Non-Edited Cattle

Lei Yang, Guangpeng Li, Zhaoyu Wen, Di Wu et al.
4 citations
Animals
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.36
article

The Impact of MSTN Gene Editing on Meat Quality and Metabolomics: A Comparative Study Among Three Breeds of MSTN-Edited and Non-Edited Cattle

Lei Yang, Guangpeng Li, Zhaoyu Wen, Di Wu, Yanan Xu, Yuanqing Liu, Dezheng Wang, Shan Luo, Lige Bu, Yuqing Yang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Myostatin (MSTN) serves as a negative regulatory factor for muscle development. A reduction in MSTN gene expression can enhance muscle mass and increase meat production. However, whether it will impact meat quality traits remains one of the major concerns in the cattle breeding industry. To explore the meat quality traits of MSTN gene-edited cattle, this study compared the meat quality traits of three MSTN gene-edited cattle breeds with those of non-gene-edited cattle, including Luxi, Angus, and Mongolian cattle, and further conducted an analysis in combination with metabolomics. We found that MSTN gene-edited cattle were superior to non-gene-edited cattle in terms of meat pH, shear force, and intramuscular fat content. However, no significant differences were observed in water-holding capacity, water content, and protein content of the meat. Metabolomics analysis revealed three upregulated differential metabolites common to MSTN gene-edited and non-gene-edited cattle across three breeds, namely lactoyl-valine, 3-phenylactic acid, and lactoyl-methionine. Some studies have indicated that these metabolites can improve the meat's flavor. In this study, we compared the meat quality traits and metabolomics data between MSTN gene-edited and non-gene-edited cattle, and found that the meat quality of MSTN gene-edited cattle was superior to that of non-gene-edited cattle.

AnimalsVol. 15(1)
Inner Mongolia University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.