A Comparative Analysis of IoT Device Fingerprinting Methods

In the Internet of Things (IoT) era where billions of connected devices interact within smart environments, ensuring secure and accurate identification of these devices is paramount. Device fingerprinting has emerged as a crucial technique to uniquely identify and monitor devices without relying on traditional authentication methods. Given the proliferation of resource-constrained IoT devices, non-intrusive and scalable security solutions are essential. Unlike conventional identification mechanisms, device fingerprinting leverages unique device characteristics to provide a robust security layer. Over the past few years, machine learning (ML) techniques have increasingly been integrated into device fingerprinting methods. These approaches can detect subtle variations in device behaviour and attributes, making them indispensable for device recognition in dynamic IoT environments. In this paper, we conduct a comparative analysis of six representative ML-based device fingerprinting methods using publicly available benchmark datasets. The performance of these methods is evaluated using several metrics, including identification accuracy, time overhead, CPU consumption, and memory usage. Our analysis shows that IoTPROFILE outperforms other methods in performance effectiveness, while IoTDevID and IoT SENTINEL excel in computational efficiency. This provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each method, offering a clear understanding of their applicability in different contexts and environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/itnac62915.2024.10815418
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of IoT Device Fingerprinting Methods

Mohammad Awrangjeb, Ali Zia, Wee Lum Tan, Mariam Munsif Mir
4 citations
Digital Media Forensic Detection
1.00
article

A Comparative Analysis of IoT Device Fingerprinting Methods

Mohammad Awrangjeb, Ali Zia, Wee Lum Tan, Mariam Munsif Mir
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In the Internet of Things (IoT) era where billions of connected devices interact within smart environments, ensuring secure and accurate identification of these devices is paramount. Device fingerprinting has emerged as a crucial technique to uniquely identify and monitor devices without relying on traditional authentication methods. Given the proliferation of resource-constrained IoT devices, non-intrusive and scalable security solutions are essential. Unlike conventional identification mechanisms, device fingerprinting leverages unique device characteristics to provide a robust security layer. Over the past few years, machine learning (ML) techniques have increasingly been integrated into device fingerprinting methods. These approaches can detect subtle variations in device behaviour and attributes, making them indispensable for device recognition in dynamic IoT environments. In this paper, we conduct a comparative analysis of six representative ML-based device fingerprinting methods using publicly available benchmark datasets. The performance of these methods is evaluated using several metrics, including identification accuracy, time overhead, CPU consumption, and memory usage. Our analysis shows that IoTPROFILE outperforms other methods in performance effectiveness, while IoTDevID and IoT SENTINEL excel in computational efficiency. This provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each method, offering a clear understanding of their applicability in different contexts and environments.

Griffith University (AU), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of IoT Device Fingerprinting Methods — Mohammad Awrangjeb, Ali Zia, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS