Impact of Respiratory Support During Hospitalization on Functional Outcomes in Long COVID: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study

Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is characterized by the persistence of one or more symptoms after the acute phase, leading to physical disabilities. This study aims to investigate whether the functional capacity and respiratory function 120 days post-COVID-19 differed according to the level of respiratory support needed during hospitalization in acute COVID-19 in the pre-vaccine rollout period. We followed up with 118 COVID-19 hospitalized patients in the acute phase until 120 days post-acute disease, with patients split into a Non-Invasive Oxygen Therapy Group (OTG, n = 72), Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group (IMV, n = 12), and Room Air Group (RAG, n = 34), assessing the body composition, respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, functional capacity, and muscle strength at the follow-up visit. In total, 54 individuals (45.8%) were female, with a median age of 48 years old (IQR: 41-58). We found that the group with IMV was older (<i>p</i> < 0.001), had more admissions to the ICU (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and had longer hospital stays (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups (OTG, IMV, and RAG) for the spirometry function (<i>p</i> = 0.31), DASI score (<i>p</i> = 0.77), manovacuometry (MIP <i>p</i> = 0.74; MEP <i>p</i> = 0.23), 6MWT (<i>p</i> = 0.43), and handgrip (<i>p</i> = 0.19) outcomes. At D120, the IMV group had an important loss of body muscle mass (BMM) and a higher BMM than RAG (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Reduction in MIP (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and MEP (<i>p</i> = 0.02) in the IMV group and OTG group when compared to the RAG was also observed. Functional outcomes at 120 days from COVID-19 hospitalization were not found to be associated with the levels of oxygen supplementation during acute disease in this group of participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22010049
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Respiratory Support During Hospitalization on Functional Outcomes in Long COVID: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study

Marcus Lacerda, Mayla Gabriela Silva Borba, Eduardo Fernandes, Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
0.37
article

Impact of Respiratory Support During Hospitalization on Functional Outcomes in Long COVID: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study

Marcus Lacerda, Mayla Gabriela Silva Borba, Eduardo Fernandes, Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro, Vanderson de Souza Sampaio, Cássia da Luz Goulart, Nádia Cubas-Vega, Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, Fernando Val, Bernardo Maia da Silva, Gisely Cardoso de Melo, Ary Serpa Neto, Camila Miriam Suemi Sato Barros do Amaral, Jefferson Valente, Anna Gabriela Rezende
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is characterized by the persistence of one or more symptoms after the acute phase, leading to physical disabilities. This study aims to investigate whether the functional capacity and respiratory function 120 days post-COVID-19 differed according to the level of respiratory support needed during hospitalization in acute COVID-19 in the pre-vaccine rollout period. We followed up with 118 COVID-19 hospitalized patients in the acute phase until 120 days post-acute disease, with patients split into a Non-Invasive Oxygen Therapy Group (OTG, n = 72), Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group (IMV, n = 12), and Room Air Group (RAG, n = 34), assessing the body composition, respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, functional capacity, and muscle strength at the follow-up visit. In total, 54 individuals (45.8%) were female, with a median age of 48 years old (IQR: 41-58). We found that the group with IMV was older (<i>p</i> < 0.001), had more admissions to the ICU (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and had longer hospital stays (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups (OTG, IMV, and RAG) for the spirometry function (<i>p</i> = 0.31), DASI score (<i>p</i> = 0.77), manovacuometry (MIP <i>p</i> = 0.74; MEP <i>p</i> = 0.23), 6MWT (<i>p</i> = 0.43), and handgrip (<i>p</i> = 0.19) outcomes. At D120, the IMV group had an important loss of body muscle mass (BMM) and a higher BMM than RAG (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Reduction in MIP (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and MEP (<i>p</i> = 0.02) in the IMV group and OTG group when compared to the RAG was also observed. Functional outcomes at 120 days from COVID-19 hospitalization were not found to be associated with the levels of oxygen supplementation during acute disease in this group of participants.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 22(1)
National Autonomous University of Honduras (HN), Fundação de Medicina Tropical (BR), Instituto de Saúde (BR), Universidade do Estado do Amazonas (BR), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (BR), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.