Performance of Different Polar Code Decoding Over NOMA Systems

In this paper, we investigate the performance of different polar decoding algorithms over an uplink non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) system. The polar code which has low complexity can be decoded in two ways: sequential decoding like successive cancellation (SC) and parallel decoding like belief propagation (BP). We further introduce their list versions: SC list (SCL), CRC-aided SC list (CA-SCL) and BP list (BPL) which have better error performance. Simulation results show that BP outperforms SC by 0.2 dB over Gaussian channel, and by 0.5 dB over Rayleigh fading channel. Meanwhile, SCL achieves performance gain of 0.2 dB over BPL in both channels. Moreover, latency analysis shows that BP can save 21.6% clock cycles (CCs) to SC and BPL can further achieve 47.7% CCs reduction compared to SCL and CA-SCL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mape62875.2024.10813662
Primary Topic
Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Different Polar Code Decoding Over NOMA Systems

Wenjie Yao, Sheng Wang, Xingjian Yi
1 links
Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
article

Performance of Different Polar Code Decoding Over NOMA Systems

Wenjie Yao, Sheng Wang, Xingjian Yi
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the performance of different polar decoding algorithms over an uplink non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) system. The polar code which has low complexity can be decoded in two ways: sequential decoding like successive cancellation (SC) and parallel decoding like belief propagation (BP). We further introduce their list versions: SC list (SCL), CRC-aided SC list (CA-SCL) and BP list (BPL) which have better error performance. Simulation results show that BP outperforms SC by 0.2 dB over Gaussian channel, and by 0.5 dB over Rayleigh fading channel. Meanwhile, SCL achieves performance gain of 0.2 dB over BPL in both channels. Moreover, latency analysis shows that BP can save 21.6% clock cycles (CCs) to SC and BPL can further achieve 47.7% CCs reduction compared to SCL and CA-SCL.

Fujian Electric Power Survey & Design Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.