Comparative Study of Different Intent Classification Algorithms for Agriculture Question and Answer Task

This research examines the effectiveness of various machine learning models in accurately classifying the intent of agricultural queries using fundamental machine learning techniques. The study analyzes two curated datasets: the QUERY dataset, containing 2,853 queries and their corresponding intents, and the ANSWERS dataset, which includes crops and their associated intents, covering 21 intent categories across 30 different crops. The main objective is to evaluate the performance of traditional machine learning models on this dataset to enable accurate intent classification, facilitating responsive interactions via the QA system, which delivers data-driven answers to farmers' queries. Notably, the Support Vector Classifier demonstrated the best performance with an accuracy of 92<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">%</sup>, closely followed by the Linear Discriminant Analysis Classifier. Using the Support Vector Classifier, the QA system efficiently retrieves responses from the ANSWERS dataset. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the performance of various algorithms for the question-answering (QA) task in the agricultural domain. The evaluation is based on pre-modelled classification reports from Sklearn's metrics package, ensuring rigorous analysis and detailed insights into the effectiveness of each approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icecie63774.2024.10815659
Primary Topic
Text and Document Classification Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Different Intent Classification Algorithms for Agriculture Question and Answer Task

Supriya Shanbhag, Veena Desai, Pratijnya Ajawan, Nikita Hemant Kodkany
Text and Document Classification Technologies
article

Comparative Study of Different Intent Classification Algorithms for Agriculture Question and Answer Task

Supriya Shanbhag, Veena Desai, Pratijnya Ajawan, Nikita Hemant Kodkany
article en

Abstract

This research examines the effectiveness of various machine learning models in accurately classifying the intent of agricultural queries using fundamental machine learning techniques. The study analyzes two curated datasets: the QUERY dataset, containing 2,853 queries and their corresponding intents, and the ANSWERS dataset, which includes crops and their associated intents, covering 21 intent categories across 30 different crops. The main objective is to evaluate the performance of traditional machine learning models on this dataset to enable accurate intent classification, facilitating responsive interactions via the QA system, which delivers data-driven answers to farmers' queries. Notably, the Support Vector Classifier demonstrated the best performance with an accuracy of 92<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">%</sup>, closely followed by the Linear Discriminant Analysis Classifier. Using the Support Vector Classifier, the QA system efficiently retrieves responses from the ANSWERS dataset. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the performance of various algorithms for the question-answering (QA) task in the agricultural domain. The evaluation is based on pre-modelled classification reports from Sklearn's metrics package, ensuring rigorous analysis and detailed insights into the effectiveness of each approach.

KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Text and Document Classification Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.