Hammering Tests of Tiles Fixed with Organic Adhesives with the aid of Machine Learning

The rubbing sounds of the tiles fixed on concrete bases with organic adhesives are analyzed with the aid of machine learning. We demonstrate that the the loose tiles (adhesion rates: 0% or 60%) and the secure tiles (adhesion rates: 80% or 100%) are distinguishable with no less than 95% of accuracy by virtue of the machine learning models build from the sounds, even though this task has not been considered feasible so far. We examine the generalization performance of the models in two cases. Using two different inspection rods, one to build the learning models and the other to generate the test data, we find that the accuracy turned out to be 90% or better. Limiting the training data to 0% and 100% specimens, we examine if the model can classify 60% and 80% specimens to find that the accuracy mostly falls within the range of 70%–90%, although it drops down to 50% in some cases. Admittedly leaving challenges, these results show the possibility of the extensive generalization of our simple learning model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/candarw64572.2024.00027
Primary Topic
Advanced machining processes and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hammering Tests of Tiles Fixed with Organic Adhesives with the aid of Machine Learning

Atsushi Ito, Masako Saitō, Katsuhiko Hibino, Masafumi Koike
2 links
Advanced machining processes and optimization
article

Hammering Tests of Tiles Fixed with Organic Adhesives with the aid of Machine Learning

Atsushi Ito, Masako Saitō, Katsuhiko Hibino, Masafumi Koike
article en

Abstract

The rubbing sounds of the tiles fixed on concrete bases with organic adhesives are analyzed with the aid of machine learning. We demonstrate that the the loose tiles (adhesion rates: 0% or 60%) and the secure tiles (adhesion rates: 80% or 100%) are distinguishable with no less than 95% of accuracy by virtue of the machine learning models build from the sounds, even though this task has not been considered feasible so far. We examine the generalization performance of the models in two cases. Using two different inspection rods, one to build the learning models and the other to generate the test data, we find that the accuracy turned out to be 90% or better. Limiting the training data to 0% and 100% specimens, we examine if the model can classify 60% and 80% specimens to find that the accuracy mostly falls within the range of 70%–90%, although it drops down to 50% in some cases. Admittedly leaving challenges, these results show the possibility of the extensive generalization of our simple learning model.

Utsunomiya University (JP), Chuo University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Advanced machining processes and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.