Opposing Mean Error Compensation for Accuracy Enhancement in Analog Compute-in-Memory With Resistive Switching Devices

Analog compute-in-memory (ACiM) systems show promise for energy-efficient AI inference, but their performance is hindered by variations in conductance, resulting in reduced accuracy. This work investigates the impact of mean error, which represents the discrepancy between actual conductance values and their intended targets from the measured distribution of 256 kb analog resistive switching cells, on the accuracy of neural network models. We propose opposing mean error compensation (OMEC), a technique that mitigates these errors without necessitating alterations to the memory device. Through simulations, we illustrate that adjusting weight targets can lead to a remarkable improvement in the inference accuracy, elevating it from a mere 12.59% to an impressive 90.65%, without modifying the memory device.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ted.2024.3516731
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opposing Mean Error Compensation for Accuracy Enhancement in Analog Compute-in-Memory With Resistive Switching Devices

Seon Yong, Wei-Hsing Huang, Woocheol Lee, Won-Tae Koo et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
0.21
article

Opposing Mean Error Compensation for Accuracy Enhancement in Analog Compute-in-Memory With Resistive Switching Devices

Seon Yong, Wei-Hsing Huang, Woocheol Lee, Won-Tae Koo, John Kim, Seho Lee, Shimeng Yu, Dong Ik Suh, Jaeyun Yi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Analog compute-in-memory (ACiM) systems show promise for energy-efficient AI inference, but their performance is hindered by variations in conductance, resulting in reduced accuracy. This work investigates the impact of mean error, which represents the discrepancy between actual conductance values and their intended targets from the measured distribution of 256 kb analog resistive switching cells, on the accuracy of neural network models. We propose opposing mean error compensation (OMEC), a technique that mitigates these errors without necessitating alterations to the memory device. Through simulations, we illustrate that adjusting weight targets can lead to a remarkable improvement in the inference accuracy, elevating it from a mere 12.59% to an impressive 90.65%, without modifying the memory device.

IEEE Transactions on Electron DevicesVol. 72(2)
SK Group (United States) (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), SK Group (South Korea) (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.