Assessing NOAA/GFDL Models Performance for South American Seasonal Climate: Insights from CMIP6 Historical Runs and Future Projections

Climate prediction is of fundamental importance to various sectors of society and the economy, as it can predict the likelihood of droughts or excessive rainfall in vulnerable regions. Climate models are useful tools in producing reliable climate forecasts, which have become increasingly vital due to the rising impacts of climate change. As global temperatures rise, changes in precipitation patterns are expected, increasing the importance of reliable seasonal forecasts to support planning and adaptation efforts. In this study, we evaluated the performance of NOAA/GFDL models from CMIP6 simulations in representing the climate of South America under three configurations: atmosphere-only, coupled ocean-atmosphere, and Earth system. Our analysis revealed that all three configurations successfully captured key climatic features, such as the South Atlantic Convergence Zone (SACZ), the Bolivian High, and the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). However, coupled models exhibited larger errors and lower correlation (below 0.6), particularly over the ocean and the South American Monsoon System, which indicates a poor representation of precipitation compared with atmospheric models. The coupled models also overestimated upward motion linked to the southern Hadley cell during austral summer and underestimated it during winter, whereas the atmosphere-only models more accurately simulated the Walker circulation, showing stronger vertical motion around the Amazon. In contrast, the coupled models simulated stronger upward motion over Northeast Brazil, which is inconsistent with reanalysis data. Moreover, we provided insights into how model biases may evolve under climate change scenarios. Future climate projections for the mid-century period (2030–2060) under the SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios indicate significant changes in the global energy balance, with an increase of up to 0.9 W/m2. Additionally, the projections reveal significant warming and drying in most of the continent, particularly during the austral spring, accompanied by increases in sensible heat flux and decreases in latent heat flux. These findings highlight the risk of severe and prolonged droughts in some regions and intensified rainfall in others. By identifying and quantifying the biases inherent in climate models, this study provides insights to enhance seasonal forecasts in South America, ultimately supporting strategic planning, impact assessments, and adaptation strategies in vulnerable regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13010004
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing NOAA/GFDL Models Performance for South American Seasonal Climate: Insights from CMIP6 Historical Runs and Future Projections

Diego Jatobá Santos, Juliana Aparecida Anochi, Marília Harumi Shimizu
2 citations
Climate
Climate variability and models
0.57
article

Assessing NOAA/GFDL Models Performance for South American Seasonal Climate: Insights from CMIP6 Historical Runs and Future Projections

Diego Jatobá Santos, Juliana Aparecida Anochi, Marília Harumi Shimizu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Climate prediction is of fundamental importance to various sectors of society and the economy, as it can predict the likelihood of droughts or excessive rainfall in vulnerable regions. Climate models are useful tools in producing reliable climate forecasts, which have become increasingly vital due to the rising impacts of climate change. As global temperatures rise, changes in precipitation patterns are expected, increasing the importance of reliable seasonal forecasts to support planning and adaptation efforts. In this study, we evaluated the performance of NOAA/GFDL models from CMIP6 simulations in representing the climate of South America under three configurations: atmosphere-only, coupled ocean-atmosphere, and Earth system. Our analysis revealed that all three configurations successfully captured key climatic features, such as the South Atlantic Convergence Zone (SACZ), the Bolivian High, and the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). However, coupled models exhibited larger errors and lower correlation (below 0.6), particularly over the ocean and the South American Monsoon System, which indicates a poor representation of precipitation compared with atmospheric models. The coupled models also overestimated upward motion linked to the southern Hadley cell during austral summer and underestimated it during winter, whereas the atmosphere-only models more accurately simulated the Walker circulation, showing stronger vertical motion around the Amazon. In contrast, the coupled models simulated stronger upward motion over Northeast Brazil, which is inconsistent with reanalysis data. Moreover, we provided insights into how model biases may evolve under climate change scenarios. Future climate projections for the mid-century period (2030–2060) under the SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios indicate significant changes in the global energy balance, with an increase of up to 0.9 W/m2. Additionally, the projections reveal significant warming and drying in most of the continent, particularly during the austral spring, accompanied by increases in sensible heat flux and decreases in latent heat flux. These findings highlight the risk of severe and prolonged droughts in some regions and intensified rainfall in others. By identifying and quantifying the biases inherent in climate models, this study provides insights to enhance seasonal forecasts in South America, ultimately supporting strategic planning, impact assessments, and adaptation strategies in vulnerable regions.

ClimateVol. 13(1)
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Climate variability and models
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.