Magnetometry: Solving the fundamental ambiguity from line pair inversion

Context. All magnetic field vector measurements lead to ambiguous results. Aims. We demonstrate that carrying out observations in two different lines belonging to the same multiplet, but with different absorption coefficients (and thus formed at two different depths, e.g., Fe I 6302.5 Å and 6301.5 Å) allow for the azimuth ambiguity remaining from the Zeeman signal interpretation to be resolved. Methods. The measurement based on an interpretation of the Zeeman effect relates to the magnetic field, H , and not the divergence-free magnetic induction, B . We analyzed how the anisotropy of the photosphere, which is strongly stratified due to gravity and density at the star surface, affects the estimation of div H . We also considered how the ambiguity resolution ought to be performed in these conditions. Results. We obtained two ambiguity-resolved field vector maps at two different, but nonetheless close altitudes. This allowed us to derive the current density full vector via curl H = J . The process revealed the horizontal component of the current density, which is generally found to be markedly larger than the better known vertical one. We observed some systematical trends and present some examples in this paper, such as circular currents wrapping spots clockwise about a positive polarity spot and counterclockwise about a negative polarity spot. We also detail the strong horizontal current components crossing active region neutral lines. Conclusions. Finally, we remark that the Na I D1 and D2 lines form another such line pair. We propose them as a way to access the low chromosphere where they are formed. However, a better spatial resolution for both observations and analysis would likely be necessary in such a medium.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348632
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetometry: Solving the fundamental ambiguity from line pair inversion

V'eronique Bommier
1 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
0.33
article

Magnetometry: Solving the fundamental ambiguity from line pair inversion

V'eronique Bommier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Context. All magnetic field vector measurements lead to ambiguous results. Aims. We demonstrate that carrying out observations in two different lines belonging to the same multiplet, but with different absorption coefficients (and thus formed at two different depths, e.g., Fe I 6302.5 Å and 6301.5 Å) allow for the azimuth ambiguity remaining from the Zeeman signal interpretation to be resolved. Methods. The measurement based on an interpretation of the Zeeman effect relates to the magnetic field, H , and not the divergence-free magnetic induction, B . We analyzed how the anisotropy of the photosphere, which is strongly stratified due to gravity and density at the star surface, affects the estimation of div H . We also considered how the ambiguity resolution ought to be performed in these conditions. Results. We obtained two ambiguity-resolved field vector maps at two different, but nonetheless close altitudes. This allowed us to derive the current density full vector via curl H = J . The process revealed the horizontal component of the current density, which is generally found to be markedly larger than the better known vertical one. We observed some systematical trends and present some examples in this paper, such as circular currents wrapping spots clockwise about a positive polarity spot and counterclockwise about a negative polarity spot. We also detail the strong horizontal current components crossing active region neutral lines. Conclusions. Finally, we remark that the Na I D1 and D2 lines form another such line pair. We propose them as a way to access the low chromosphere where they are formed. However, a better spatial resolution for both observations and analysis would likely be necessary in such a medium.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 694
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.