An Empirical Analysis of Transformer-Based and Convolutional Neural Network Approaches for Early Detection and Diagnosis of Cancer Using Multimodal Imaging and Genomic Data

Early diagnosis of cancer has focused on the use of advanced algorithms to achieve accurate diagnosis. The proposed study assesses the effectiveness of Transformer-based models and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in cancer diagnosis with respect to multimodal imaging and genomic data. The performance comparisons between the two algorithmic methods with such complex datasets, which combine multi-modal imaging and genomic information, are presented. In search of the optimal neural network configuration, a series of experiments were conducted with respect to different layers, attention mechanisms in case of transformers, and convolutional architectures in case of CNNs. Besides, parameters related to training, such as learning rates, batch sizes, and optimization algorithms, have also been systematically tuned. The different models were evaluated against accuracy, precision, recall, and the F1-score. Our results show that the proposed multimodal model, with accuracy from 92.5 to 93.2, F1-scores between 91.5 and 92.2, precision of 91.5 to 92.2, and recall values of 92.5 to 93.2. In contrast, much lower accuracy, F1-scores, precision, and recall values were noticed when using baselines, especially VGG. All these findings indicate the fact that the presented techniques, especially the Multimodal and Transformer models, are more robust solutions for classification tasks with better balance between precision and recall, as well as with higher overall accuracy. This came with the cost of the expense of computational resources: CNNs are less resource-intensive but have competitive performance with better precision and recall. The results underline how algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization play a crucial role in cancer detection tasks. This study has shown how state-of-the-art deep learning methods can be effectively combined with multi-modal data for building more accurate and efficient systems in cancer diagnosis. Two main lines of future work would be improving these algorithms and understanding their applicability in real clinical practice to obtain maximum benefits from them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3524564
Citations
11
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Empirical Analysis of Transformer-Based and Convolutional Neural Network Approaches for Early Detection and Diagnosis of Cancer Using Multimodal Imaging and Genomic Data

Jaehyuk Cho, Sandeep Kumar Mathivanan, S Sangeetha, V. Muthukumaran et al.
11 citations
IEEE Access
AI in cancer detection
3.82
article

An Empirical Analysis of Transformer-Based and Convolutional Neural Network Approaches for Early Detection and Diagnosis of Cancer Using Multimodal Imaging and Genomic Data

Jaehyuk Cho, Sandeep Kumar Mathivanan, S Sangeetha, V. Muthukumaran, V E Sathishkumar
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Early diagnosis of cancer has focused on the use of advanced algorithms to achieve accurate diagnosis. The proposed study assesses the effectiveness of Transformer-based models and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in cancer diagnosis with respect to multimodal imaging and genomic data. The performance comparisons between the two algorithmic methods with such complex datasets, which combine multi-modal imaging and genomic information, are presented. In search of the optimal neural network configuration, a series of experiments were conducted with respect to different layers, attention mechanisms in case of transformers, and convolutional architectures in case of CNNs. Besides, parameters related to training, such as learning rates, batch sizes, and optimization algorithms, have also been systematically tuned. The different models were evaluated against accuracy, precision, recall, and the F1-score. Our results show that the proposed multimodal model, with accuracy from 92.5 to 93.2, F1-scores between 91.5 and 92.2, precision of 91.5 to 92.2, and recall values of 92.5 to 93.2. In contrast, much lower accuracy, F1-scores, precision, and recall values were noticed when using baselines, especially VGG. All these findings indicate the fact that the presented techniques, especially the Multimodal and Transformer models, are more robust solutions for classification tasks with better balance between precision and recall, as well as with higher overall accuracy. This came with the cost of the expense of computational resources: CNNs are less resource-intensive but have competitive performance with better precision and recall. The results underline how algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization play a crucial role in cancer detection tasks. This study has shown how state-of-the-art deep learning methods can be effectively combined with multi-modal data for building more accurate and efficient systems in cancer diagnosis. Two main lines of future work would be improving these algorithms and understanding their applicability in real clinical practice to obtain maximum benefits from them.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Galgotias University (IN), Jeonbuk National University (KR), Sunway University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
AI in cancer detection
3.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.